ITM
Out on the front line, don't worry I'll be fine...
- Jan 26, 2012
- 4,792
- 2,733
You may be right but I did a quick, back-of-the-envelope calculation - I am sure any number of you will tell me why I am wrong, but next year the Leafs will have $30M in cap space for Matthews, Marner, Kapanen, Johnsson, Nylander, Josh Leivo, Ron Hainsey, a back-up goalie and Jake Gardiner. Suppose they replace Johnsson, Josh Leivo, Ron Hainsey, a back-up goalie and Jake Gardiner with spare pieces for about $1M each or a total of $5M. Then you figure Matthews and Marner get $20M between them, which is probably on the low side. That means only $5M for Kapanen and Nylander. If that analysis is right, the Leafs may not have room for a long-term deal for Nylander.
I get your point. That it's possible all will not end well in what some might perceive as Leafs fans portraying the situation around Nylander and the club's ability to ice a contending team as being naive, at best and at worst, delusional.
My point in the reply you quoted sees the plausible outcome of Nylander (and his agent) vs Dubas (and Pridham and Gilman) given the other actual outcomes of Nylander's agent and his clients and the positive resolved results as something to reasonably expect. It doesn't mean to imply that the unexpected isn't possible, just that there's reason to expect what's repeatedly happened before in similar situations.
Now that doesn't remove other possible problems moving forward. But we need to deal in what can be reasonably inferred from the actors and the situations of similar instances rather than speculate in spite of available patterns. Said differently, we need to be able to synthesize accurately in order to analyze accurately.
For example, you suppose Jake Gardiner et al is going to be replaced by spare pieces at an average hit of $1M. But that presupposes other assets won't be moved in order to accommodate what management sees as necessary vs incidental pieces to achieve the desired outcome.
I don't believe for a moment that Zach Hyman and Connor Brown and Nikita Zaitsev are perceived as life-long Leafs no matter (as in the case of Hyman) how much pumping the coaching staff attempts to inflate their perceived value. That's around $10M in relatively elastic assets that could be replaced internally. There's Marleau's last year and there's Horton's the following season that become much more pliable to the desired end. Certainly Pridham and Gilman and Dubas have already run scenarios in the multiplicative.
And I think it's reasonable to believe, given their particular specializations measured against their peers in the league, that if they can't complete the puzzle, no other management team could. This to say, it's reasonable to believe that they will not be surprised by the unexpected having surely accounted - literally - for every outcome.
And if that includes maximizing Nylander into something else as a result of an unwanted outcome accounted for, it may be an undesirable outcome but it won't have been an unknown outcome.
If these last years of transformation have informed me of anything, unlike previous management groups, it's that any anxiety I might have about personnel movement is something to be optimistic about. Over and over and over again, as cliche as it may sound, the group assembled by Shanahan has rewarded my faith, not betrayed it.
I see no reason to believe differently in this instance either.