Arzak
Registered User
- Mar 27, 2019
- 2,225
- 2,012
Could this be part of the negotiations?
This. I can see Leafs trying to market him as a potential C.
Could this be part of the negotiations?
It'd really be 1, 2A, 2B, 4.
Nylander and Tavares would still get 18+ minutes a night hopefully.
Stack the lines in the offensive zone sometimes, and throw out Lafferty - Kampf - Jarnkrok for the odd defensive zone draw too.
Maybe that is his ask before he signs an extension?
10 as a winger
9.5 if he gets to play center
This. I can see Leafs trying to market him as a potential C.
Or future replacement. If they plan to re-sign Nylander, taking over from Tavares long term (who will not make close to 11 million next time) will be the long range plan.Fist step in moving Tavares to the wing.
Why would they need a 'handshake deal'? Just sign him then.With Kane hanging around in Mississauga, maybe the Leafs and Kane have a hand shake deal in place and which is why they have Nylander at center.
Bertuzzi-Matthews-Marner
Knies-Tavares-Kane
Domi-Nylander-Jarnkrok
Reaves-Kampf-Lafferty
As the coach, you literally run your top 3 lines over and over again and play your 4th line when you need a energy pick me up lol.
They're already over the cap by 3 million, kinda hard to sign him now don't you think? Let him get the best treatment and recovery he can while the Leafs figure out their cap and in December when he's possibly ready to go, then you sign him. By then you'd have to assume with either players going on waivers or trades or even injuries, the Leafs would have a much clearer picture regarding their cap during the season.Why would they need a 'handshake deal'? Just sign him then.
Exactly this. In house JT replacement.I think if Nylander is a success at C the Leafs rest easy paying him in the high 9’s or more knowing they have a JT replacement.
wouldn't he go on the injured list?They're already over the cap by 3 million, kinda hard to sign him now don't you think? Let him get the best treatment and recovery he can while the Leafs figure out their cap and in December when he's possibly ready to go, then you sign him. By then you'd have to assume with either players going on waivers or trades or even injuries, the Leafs would have a much clearer picture regarding their cap during the season.
The further into the season they go, the higher the cap hit. So waiting hurts them more.They're already over the cap by 3 million, kinda hard to sign him now don't you think? Let him get the best treatment and recovery he can while the Leafs figure out their cap and in December when he's possibly ready to go, then you sign him. By then you'd have to assume with either players going on waivers or trades or even injuries, the Leafs would have a much clearer picture regarding their cap during the season.
You sign him now and put him on the LTIR, you're literally shooting yourself in the foot because now when he comes off the LTIR, you're going to need that cap space to do it and if you need to make a trade, you have zero leverage as teams know you're desperateThe further into the season they go, the higher the cap hit. So waiting hurts them more.
The only thing that makes any sense is that there is a deal that moves out significant cap prior to puck drop in Game 1.
Best move is sign and LTIR for now.
How is that any different than signing him once he's healthy? How much space do you think they'd need?You sign him now and put him on the LTIR, you're literally shooting yourself in the foot because now when he comes off the LTIR, you're going to need that cap space to do it and if you need to make a trade, you have zero leverage as teams know you're desperate
There's a big difference. You sign him now, you're putting yourself in a corner when it comes to activating him off the LTIR whereas if you wait until December to sign him. You allow yourself 3 months to figure out your salary.How is that any different than signing him once he's healthy? How much space do you think they'd need?
Not seeing the difference, you still have months to figure it out.There's a big difference. You sign him now, you're putting yourself in a corner when it comes to activating him off the LTIR whereas if you wait until December to sign him. You allow yourself 3 months to figure out your salary.
What am I missing? Wouldn't, hypothetically for easy numbers, a $1,000,000 contract signed at the calendar mid point of the NHL regular season only go as $500,000 on the cap?The further into the season they go, the higher the cap hit. So waiting hurts them more.
The only thing that makes any sense is that there is a deal that moves out significant cap prior to puck drop in Game 1.
Best move is sign and LTIR for now.
Yes, you still have months to figure it out but if you're the GM of the opposition, you have all the leverage because you know 100% that Toronto has to make a trade to get cap compliant to take Kane off the LTIR. Treliving is forced to make a trade which he would have 0 leverage.Not seeing the difference, you still have months to figure it out.
It won't be a secret, teams will know where he is going. I don't think leverage is that big a deal. Teams do favours for each other all the time.Yes, you still have months to figure it out but if you're the GM of the opposition, you have all the leverage because you know 100% that Toronto has to make a trade to get cap compliant to take Kane off the LTIR. Treliving is forced to make a trade which he would have 0 leverage.
Whereas if you wait to sign him until December, you still have leverage when it comes to trades. Players can get hurt during the season and be placed on LTIR, or players underperformed and you place them on waivers.
Why lose all leverage and sign Kane now when you can keep your leverage and sign him when you're 100% certain he's healthy enough to play again.
Look at Nylanders first year of his current contract on cap friendly, and the hit for that season. I believe it would follow that same logic?What am I missing? Wouldn't, hypothetically for easy numbers, a $1,000,000 contract signed at the calendar mid point of the NHL regular season only go as $500,000 on the cap?
Here is the calculation according to CapFriendly.Look at Nylanders first year of his current contract on cap friendly, and the hit for that season. I believe it would follow that same logic?
Could be wrong though....
How do you know that he won't "budge from his $10 million ask"?Making Nylander a centre will make him more expensive to keep. Great. Like we weren’t having enough trouble trying to get him to budge from his $10 million ask.
Cutting your second-best scorer's ice time by 3 1/2 minutes per game sounds perfectly reasonable.Line 1 - 22 mins/game
Line 2a and 2b - 15 mins each
Line 4 - 8 mins
I see nothing wrong with this.