Cool Hand Puke
Registered User
- Aug 11, 2008
- 5,125
- 6,652
I’m not talking about rejecting the trades… I would too… but the attitude is wild.oh that's right, no one else would either. LOL...sorry
I’m not talking about rejecting the trades… I would too… but the attitude is wild.oh that's right, no one else would either. LOL...sorry
Isles are minus Nelson already, may not sign Palmieri, and will likely trade at least one of Pageau and Lee this summer. That’s 3 of their top four goal scorers and their best defensive center.The idea is that it would be Mayfield/Pulock/Mailloux
If we assume anyone > 25 is not going to be part of the 'next core' of the Islanders, your prospects are:
Eiserman (W)
Dufour (W)
Ritchie (C)
+
Pulkkinen and Odelius (D)?
In 5 years, the only current Islanders outside of those named above we would expect to see on the roster is Dobson if he signs a 7-8yr extension and maybe Holmstrom.
Yes, the Islanders could grab Schaefer and just keep chugging along with a mini-retool to hopefully build a team good enough to get over the hump - you definitely have some of the right pieces to be a perpetual wild card threat - but the moment Barzal/Horvat/Pelech/Pulock/Sorokin age out, if you were somehow a relevant wild-card team for the previous 4 years, your prospect pool will still be absolutely barren.
The next two drafts have McDavid/Matthews level talents at the top - and if there's an opportunity to completely replenish your depth, and realistically have a good chance at two top flight prospects - why not is really my question?
I guess you didn't see the comment I responded to....I’m not talking about rejecting the trades… I would too… but the attitude is wild.
A team who hasn’t been relevant since the 80s with your attitude is wild to meI guess you didn't see the comment I responded to....
Thats fine, everyone has their opinion but here fans don't like when isles shoot back a smart ass comment. It's ok, we take all the jabs.
Might as well try to sign Ehlers, instead.
So why are you bickering with me?
I'd do
Hage + 17th + Dach (1 year cap/roster)
For
Horvat + latest 2nd/3rd this year or next
if he didn't have that contract, Horvat is the player I would target. I agree with you.Habs trading for Barzal is something a GM like Dubas would do. Great offensive talent but not the piece the Habs need.
if he didn't have that contract, Horvat is the player I would target. I agree with you.
As an Islander fan I will salivate over a complete re-build and getting maximum value for everyone over 25 including Sorokin but I know that isn't going to happen because I am sure our owners are not interested in a re-build and the potential lost revenue from the drop off in attendance and no playoffs, and depending on who our new GM is I wouldn't be surprised if they are not interested in a re-build as well especially if it is an established guy who is over 55
That's the point were you are wrong.There's another trade here from a Habs fan involving those pieces (in this case we have the pleasure of losing Sorokin and Mayfield too). They keep getting offered and the message is clear at this point: they're very disposable pieces you think you can use to get a significantly better player. Mailloux has baggage and if the draft were deeper you wouldn't feel as comfortable trading both first rounders.
Neither however will be from the Islanders.That's the point were you are wrong.
We are very comfortable trading those two assets because of where we are in our rebuild and our recent success. We know we are holes to fill, and we have identified those two valuable assets as being worthy of trying to land one of those needed pieces.
If the draft was deeper and they had more value, we would still dangle them in the hope to land an even better asset.
Bookmark this: One or the two picks will be traded for immediate help at 2C or RHD.
Oh, I had misread the OP !to be clear I AM a Habs fan - I don't think this is a biased proposal, though; Barzal is coming off an injury and has been playing LW more than C for the past couple of seasons - he's also about to turn 28 and has a big cap hit. If the Habs are asked to pay more, there are presumably better fits available around the league.
Can you kindly remind us the price you paid for Horvat not so long ago ?My stance is that 16/17 and Mailloux doesn’t impress me enough to start gutting the core. It’s the quantity for quality trade your posters keep insisting on. It’s borderline the definition of insanity at this point. The Islanders if they were to move out the core and sell could get much better prospects then Mailloux for core pieces. Let’s circle back when the offer actually makes sense to improve the Islanders both in the short and longterm.
Which has absolutely nothing to do with todayCan you kindly remind us the price you paid for Horvat not so long ago ?
Still doesn’t matter. No resson to move Horvat simply because Montreal needs a 2C and their fanbase on here is convinced Islanders need to sell off the whole roster.Can you kindly remind us the price you paid for Horvat not so long ago ?
Indeed, he is 2 years older and on a huge contract now.Which has absolutely nothing to do with today
That's not the reasonning.Still doesn’t matter. No resson to move Horvat simply because Montreal needs a 2C and their fanbase on here is convinced Islanders need to sell off the whole roster.
Well the Market isn't the same. Teams have money to spend.Indeed, he is 2 years older and on a huge contract now.
I guess we will see !Well the Market isn't the same. Teams have money to spend.
Horvats play in that time might have either increased or decreased his value.
Like many Habs fan, I'd do Hage too if it brought us a quality 2C now.So why are you bickering with me?
I'd do
Hage + 17th + Dach (1 year cap/roster)
For
Horvat + latest 2nd/3rd this year or next
Still doesn’t matter. No resson to move Horvat simply because Montreal needs a 2C and their fanbase on here is convinced Islanders need to sell off the whole roster.