LightningStrikes
Champa Bay Lightning
- Nov 24, 2009
- 26,599
- 10,548
It's amazes me that so many fans have such completely opposite views of this guy.700k for Carle is a steal imo..
It's amazes me that so many fans have such completely opposite views of this guy.
He meant it is steal for Carle.
The annual reclamation project by Poile.
Ribeiro was one that worked.Ribero and who else?
Ribeiro was one that worked.Ribero and who else?
If he just plays as a 6/7, this seems like a smart move. The only risk is if Laviolette overvalues veterans and plays Carle above his head, a la Sutter playing Scuderi with Doughty after the Kings traded for him this past season. But I don't know enough about Laviolette to say if that's something he might do.
I have no sympathy for Carle ... he didn't put the work in the off-season. He got fat and lazy on his UFA contract and just didn't care. These type of guys shouldn't be picked up and given any further contracts ... Lightning had to buy him out and he gets another contract. There should be some kind of GM unwritten law about giving these type of guys a second chance. Destroys a team's cap room, gets lazy on his contract, gets a huge buyout and then no worries ... I'll try again cause now I have another contract to sign. Its a disgrace.
Ribeiro was one that worked.
Last year it was Jackman, Moses and Hodgson.
700k who cares, just bury him if he's no good.
He's an upgrade on Jackman and Bitetto.
Not to mention Roy, Jokinen, and Volchenkov the same year as Ribeiro.
The percentage of it working out isn't that high, but these are all no risk signings, so really no downside. It's not like Carle will be holding back any Milwaukee/Lada D.
Volchenkov played alright here, Ribeiro has been a 60 point player, Jackman was meh...but also not really a reclamation project either.
Jokinen was the absolute most worthless player I can recall in recent memory, Roy seemed to play okay but never generated anything to show for it. Ditto Cody Hodgson, last season.
I don't see that happening, given the chemistry Ekholm\Ellis have. I know that there's been some lipservice given to breaking up Subban\Josi but I doubt it actually happens...so Carle pretty much is where he is.
It's difficult to say anything too harsh about a no-risk signing where you can bury the player with zero cap hit if he doesn't work out. That said this thread really puts things into perspective: we couldn't wait to be rid of him while some poor Nashville fans are actually calling him an improvement on what they have. If that is actually the case you all have my deepest sympathies.
It's difficult to say anything too harsh about a no-risk signing where you can bury the player with zero cap hit if he doesn't work out. That said this thread really puts things into perspective: we couldn't wait to be rid of him while some poor Nashville fans are actually calling him an improvement on what they have. If that is actually the case you all have my deepest sympathies.
In fairness though, our top pairings play a lot more than Tampa's, so their bottom pairings have to play more.And maybe he'll be just as bad as in Nashville. Or maybe, with a change of scenery, he'll be closer to the player he used to be. No one should be speaking in absolutes.
Appreciate your sympathy, but if Matt Carle as our sixth defenseman is going to break what is probably the best defensive unit in the NHL, then there's something else going on.