Petes2424
Registered User
- Aug 4, 2005
- 8,564
- 3,444
What’s funny is, I fully expect it. Wait until it’s Ben ChiarotGoing to be fun to see someone that no one expects going for something absurd including a 2025 1st round pick (I.e. Jeannot).
What’s funny is, I fully expect it. Wait until it’s Ben ChiarotGoing to be fun to see someone that no one expects going for something absurd including a 2025 1st round pick (I.e. Jeannot).
Yup. Basically if the right player comes available Leafs will help you complete a retool in exchange for trying to win now. We have a handful of great future pieces. All of them are available for the right player even though we need them
Teams can trade first round picks in future drafts. The reason a lot of these teams don’t have firsts in the up coming draft is in many of the cases because they were already traded at past deadlines.If you dont have a 2025 1st rounder, it is going to cost a top prospect. For the Maple Leafs, teams are going to be asking for Cowan. The Jets, Lambert.
As you say that, Nick Foligno is wasting away in Chicago.
Doubt anyone is available that would move the leafs hand ( I’m not saying he’s unavailable in general just for the projected crop of deadline players; which looks super weak )If you dont have a 2025 1st rounder, it is going to cost a top prospect. For the Maple Leafs, teams are going to be asking for Cowan. The Jets, Lambert.
Not seeing them moving their 1st unless it's for a U24 player as part of a bigger trade.Was just thinking, Sabres should be selling their 1st just about now. If they want any fans at all they gotta chase playoffs, we don’t need another Savoie 3 years down the line. Ok, it could also be Cozens or Benson, but the time to strike is now! I figure we should crawl outta the basement a bit either way, that pick looks it’s highest right now.
Top 6 Cs with term, that also fit into the leafs cap cost a LOT of assets.I think the Leafs are open for business. That doesn't mean they are going to make a massive trade to do it, but if one is there that makes sense they are willing to give up their top prospects in Cowan, Minten, Danford, etc and future picks (2nd this year, 2026 first, etc).
Would need to be for a top 6 center with at least a few years of term or another similar valued piece that actually impacts the roster and not just random rental 3rd line vet guy.
Top 6 Cs with term, that also fit into the leafs cap cost a LOT of assets.
Would love to see them go for it. What kind of player would they be looking for?Was just thinking, Sabres should be selling their 1st just about now. If they want any fans at all they gotta chase playoffs, we don’t need another Savoie 3 years down the line. Ok, it could also be Cozens or Benson, but the time to strike is now! I figure we should crawl outta the basement a bit either way, that pick looks it’s highest right now.
I'm pretty sure the Jets will package a first and a prospect for a 2C or RD.
Did I miss something?
In theory, it's possible that the "in the mix" teams could end up being relatively even with each other and therefore still in the mix, and as a result, not sell until pretty much the trade deadline.There are still a fair number of teams “in the mix” so to speak.
As teams inevitably fall off, I think the sellers pool will increase accordingly.
Because there's an elite top 4 I think teams are going to be reluctant to trade that opportunity. Now if it's top 5 protected then yes, but the value isn't as high.
Carolina, Washington, and Dallas are all notoriously pretty stingy about keeping their first rounders.
Ok, it could also be Cozens or Benson, but the time to strike is now! I figure we should crawl outta the basement a bit either way, that pick looks it’s highest right now.
I listed a lot of assets, also forget the cap. Leafs have 22M+ this offseason not an issue. Just don't want a boat anchor being passed off as helpful
Yeah but Marner, Tavares and Knies have to be re-signed no?