leaffaninvancouver
formerly in Victoria
- Jan 11, 2012
- 13,819
- 8,343
What's the complaining about? Back to back games aren't exactly what Montreal would want for Carey Price.
It puts the North at a disadvantage.
What's the complaining about? Back to back games aren't exactly what Montreal would want for Carey Price.
No way. You roll with your #1 in the playoffs. Jack can handle it. Price will get both starts, you can bet on that. Campbell will too.
I think if we're up 3-0 they would play Andersen for sure. Why risk an injury.
some of y'all are really galaxy braining this. It's a back to back. Fred will start.
CJ just said that some within the Leafs org believe Freddy has a higher ceiling than Jack. They clearly don't think of him as someone who's going to just ride the bench.
It puts the North at a disadvantage.
Last year, there was a back-to-back against Columbus and Freddy started both of them. Why not Campbell here if he is playing well? Games are far too important.
When you've been in nothing but abusive relationship after abusive relationship, it's not irrational to believe that the new guy you're with will eventually turn on you.Just trying to help you avoid irrational fear!
Feel good! This is the first time we're the clearcut favorites in a series.
Because last year the alternative was Hutchinson....not Freddy. You may not agree with it but that's what is going to happen based on everything that's been reported.
It was Campbell as the backup in the play-ins. So if the Leafs are up 2-1 with a chance to step on their throats and make 3-1, they will go with Freddie? Who only had 1 game in the NHL in a couple of months? That's stupid.
Not being argumentative here, can you explain how that is.
Otherwise I'm guessing the winner of the North is going to be at a big disadvantage once it starts to play other U.S. based division. Will that North team be allowed to play any home games or be forced to become a road team for the balance of the playoffs?
Don’t care if it’s a back to back, you play Campbell in both.
I don’t think it’s that much to ask really. People make such a huge deal out of a goalie playing two games in a row. I mean c’mon, these guys are pros. They can handle it
It was Campbell as the backup in the play-ins. So if the Leafs are up 2-1 with a chance to step on their throats and make 3-1, they will go with Freddie? Who only had 1 game in the NHL in a couple of months? That's stupid.
If we're up I expect Andersen. If we're down I expect a goalie swap on the b2bI think if were up 3-0 Andersen plays. If we're up 2-1 it would be a tough call for sure.
Oops, that's my bad. Was Campbell, you're right. I'm not saying I disagree with you, but clearly the organization and fans have differing opinions on how to use Freddy. They wouldn't have given him a start yesterday if they didn't.
Last year it was Campbell. Hutchinson was with Colorado, not only that - he played in the actual playoffs (not playins) and went 2W 1L vs. DallasBecause last year the alternative was Hutchinson....not Freddy. You may not agree with it but that's what is going to happen based on everything that's been reported.
price also will have not played a real game in exactly a month when game 1 starts(injured april 19th)i think this is a campbell vs allen series, and i believe its a tossup...allen has more experience in the playoffs but has always seemed to struggle more when called upon as the clear cut number one for a team. should be an interesting battle.
edit: i mean the goaltending battle, i picked leafs in 5.
Is it just me or is anyone else a little worried about the reffing?
If it’s fair I’d say Leafs in 5, but I can also see the refs hand the habs an extra win
.06 is nothing like a rounding error. Varlamov is the guy in 2nd at .929, in order to drop his average down to .923 he would have needed to give up 7 more goals on the same number of shots in his 35 starts. Or conversely, be scored on 7 straight times in his next start without making a save.I'd take that match up all day any day.
Jack Campbell - 2.11 GAA good for 6th best
Jack Campbell - 0.923 SV% good for 7th (tied) - 0.929 is 2nd . 06 is a rounding error difference.
Jake Allen - 2.68 GAA (26th)
Jake Allen - 0.907 SV% (30th)