The Podium
Registered User
So because you don't "understand the angle", you think Matthews is lying?
Source?
Source? I’ve played hockey, and know how the good players feel about the scrubs.
So because you don't "understand the angle", you think Matthews is lying?
Source?
Typical Leaf fan.Typical Leafs fans. We win and there are still some comparing about Simmonds and Clifford. These guys are never happy unless Malgin and Petan are in the lineup.
Ok I somewhat agree, but in no way were Clifford/Simmons "invisible".I think people are giving Simmonds and Clifford a bit too much credit here…. They were invisible physically. Clifford was just invisible period, at least Simmonds had a great game.
I never understand the “feel protected” angle when these guys are playing less than 10 minutes and never against the guys who are “punishing” our players. I understand when you have a Tom Wilson or Tkachuk brother, but a 4th line enforcer will never convince a top 9 player to engage in a fight, and may get burned trying a retaliatory hit. The enforcer role is going extinct for a reason.
Maybe there is some merit to the “prepare them mentally for a physical game” angle, but the Leafs/Jets games always get out of hand so they were likely expecting a physical game regardless.
Happy Simmonds got back in the lineup, especially when NAK has had a rough start to the season, but I don’t think his presence is the reason Reilly fought in defense of Robertson.
Matthews seems to disagree with you. Unless you are calling him a liar.Source? I’ve played hockey, and know how the good players feel about the scrubs.
It's been explained several times in both the GDT and the PGT. It's bigger than simply TOI and direct actions.I never understand the “feel protected” angle when these guys are playing less than 10 minutes and never against the guys who are “punishing” our players.
Ok I somewhat agree, but in no way were Clifford/Simmons "invisible".
A primary assist (for instance) is not a play an invisible player does. You have to be active in the offensive zone (in most occasions) to get a primary assist.
It seems to me that you're worried that 2 fighters are now stealing 4th line jobs. I don't think they are. Not yet. I don't think ZAR and NAK are though. They might have better defensive track records, but it doesn't show. At least not yet.
The 4th line for Dubas/Keefe is a work in progress.
Matthews seems to disagree with you. Unless you are calling him a liar.
Matthews is a liar. Good to know.Simmonds had a great game and definitely earned another start. Without question he was a bigger contributor in last nights game than NAK has been all season.
Clifford was invisible, that is who I was referring to.
Of course he is a liar, has a player ever, in the history of the game, publicly called out a teammate? Especially in this market! Come on man…
That’s funny. Many have both played and coached, and know this well too, and they disagree with you. The players on the pro team we’re discussing disagree with you.Source? I’ve played hockey, and know how the good players feel about the scrubs.
That’s funny. Many have both played and coached, and know this well too, and they disagree with you. The players on the pro team we’re discussing disagree with you.
So how did the good players on the team feel about playing with you, since you have intimate knowledge![]()
Lets ask Leafs best player.
Who says anyone is willing to settle for anything? It’s irrelevant. Nobody here has any say in roster moves of the team.Fun fact: I was the physical scrub, I have a ton of self awareness.
You guys are willing to settle for mediocrity, that’s the difference. Gary Roberts, Wendel Clark, Cam Neely, or more recently Matthew/Brady Tkachuk, Tom Wilson, those are the types of players that can protect their teammates in todays game. Those are the players who physical presence is felt and will convince other teams to shy away from contact.
Yeah. You keep mentioning that. How well did you do in a team sport where you had no respect for your team?Source? I’ve played hockey, and know how the good players feel about the scrubs.
Who says anyone is willing to settle for anything? It’s irrelevant. Nobody here has any say in roster moves of the team.
When we play the Jets, the cheap garbage happens, and you need guys who will respond, or set the tone. Guys like Simmonds do that. Clifford is little more than a willing puncher, but in a game that gets outta hand, you may need one or two of those.
This idea that guys don’t get juiced up and rally around the guys who swing is false.
Source: Everyone but you
Yeah. You keep mentioning that. How well did you do in a team sport where you had no respect for your team?
Which Junior A team did you play for?
I think many of us played hockey. Do we have the authority to put down 4th line NHLers?
We don't have that. The core is soft in that regard which is why being able to insert a guy like Simmonds in there allows the core to play shit bigger noone someone has your back and won't just stand there and watch you get ragdolledFun fact: I was the physical scrub, I have a ton of self awareness.
You guys are willing to settle for mediocrity, that’s the difference. Gary Roberts, Wendel Clark, Cam Neely, or more recently Matthew/Brady Tkachuk, Tom Wilson, those are the types of players that can protect their teammates in todays game. Those are the players who physical presence is felt and will convince other teams to shy away from contact.
He did. Except it was in a bra and panties.Why didn't Logan Stanley dress tonight?
Simmonds and Clifford clearly had an agenda to change the narrative last night. They were on a crusade. They were honest with the team and didn't lie to each other. The refs were unlucky last night with their expected goals.
What's is Matthews' agenda here? Why is he lying? It's like he's on a crusade to keep the narrative alive. Unlucky.
I don't like it one bit.
Benn is as tough as either of those players. Retributiom is fun to watch, but doesn't change how Matthews is feeling todayDallas Stars abused Matthews the game prior and Auston was still holding his hip in this game after some shots feeling the effects of the abuse he took unanswered.
Had Jamie Benn done that with Simmonds and Clifford in the line-up he might be missing a few teeth today, and most certainly would have been challenged to a fight.
Its great that Auston has added "hits and physical play" to his game to try and get his teammates more engaged physically, but he knows he has added help driving up the teams intensity level when Simmonds and Clifford are also sitting on the Leafs bench willing to do their parts as well.
I personally enjoyed this game the most of the Leafs 6 games this season, because I got to watch high impact real Hockey and not low contact figure skating.
I don't think I agree with you about Clifford. I'm not saying he's the answer, but he was not invisible. Yes. I wish TOR had a lot more jam in the top 6. That's Dubas' cross to bare. The likelihood of 1 or 2 players with physicality being injected into the top 6 is slim. I think they thought Thornton and Foligno could have done this, but it didn't work out. I also think that Matthews has tried to be a physical presence in early season and is now suffering an injury because of it.I respected my team… I was a very self aware physical scrub. I’m literally talking from experience.
Anyway, this conversation got way out of hand.
Simmonds had a great game, I hope he’s in for the next one.
Summary of my point: the Leafs need physicality in their Top 6, not on the 4th line.