The Crypto Guy
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 28,307
- 36,915
Not if he plays like he did last year.Damn that is a pretty sweet cap hit for NJ.
Not if he plays like he did last year.Damn that is a pretty sweet cap hit for NJ.
In fairness, EV defense and penalty killing is not the same thingI would respectfully disagree with you. If he is bad defensively, why did Jersey use him on the PK?
I don't understand. He's poor defensively even strength but a good penalty killer? I think if you look at the metrics, you'll find he's above average defensively even strength.In fairness, EV defense and penalty killing is not the same thing
How about the year prior?Not if he plays like he did last year.
Sure. 56 point player for 4M is great.How about the year prior?
How is he pretty bad defensively? Not to mention he hasnt even turned 23 yetHe is pretty bad defensively and can't be trusted at center, so he really needs to score points in order to provide value. Last year he struggled to score points and it really hurt his value. With NJ getting healthy and adding some significant depth, and a new coach, I think his numbers will bounce back and he'll get a very nice contract in 3 years (either in NJ or elsewhere).
He is in that perfect sweet spot of young enough and cheap enough that if he REALLY sucks you can probably find a desperate team to take him as a reclamation project, and if he REALLY improves you can trade him away for a small ransom.
Probably trying to see if there could be a way to get a long-term deal done and just wasn't possible with their cap structureIf you'd have asked me in June what contract he would get, this is exactly what I would have said. What took so long?
If he's played with one of our top 2 centers and played on PP2 he should be able to reach 60-70 points.I always wonder what his point total ceiling is with NJ.. NJ obviously have some other offensive studs on the team that put up more points than Mercer and get the prime mins on the first line and first PP group… Mercer is a good young player but seems as though he will be on that second line and 2nd PP for quite some time.
What do Devils fans think his ceiling is?? I always think he should every season be in the 50-60 point mark roughly???
Seems like a good contract for both sides
1.) Defense and penalty killing are not the same thing. Mercer is a good PKer but is a dog chasing cars at 5v5.I would respectfully disagree with you. If he is bad defensively, why did Jersey use him on the PK? He was second on the team for forwards SH TOI per game behind Haula.
Look who showed up to crap on something good for NJ. I am so surprised as that is so out of character for you. You never purposely try to antagonize the NJ fanbase as that would be a ToS violation.Not if he plays like he did last year.
For who?4M is highway robbery.
Would you say the same about Alexis Lafreniere?Sure. 56 point player for 4M is great.
Yep. Great for the team, not so much the player. I'm sure his next contract will be massive.Mercer sold low on himself.
I figured Mercer would sign for more $$ and 2 years, so this works well for the team. Looking at comparable young defensemen I figure Luke will slot in at the same 8 Million dollar range.Devils have a nice culture of taking a team discount. Let’s see if Luke matches Jack’s contract.
He held out that long to get that? What an absolutely bizarre deal to have signed.
Happy for the Devils as a team though.
Who says he could have gotten 2 for 3.5?No way should've Mercer signed a 3 year deal at all let alone for that little.
He should've did two for 3.5. head into the 3rd year with arbitration rights...
It's a great deal for New Jersey, it was almost an absolute necessity for the Devils to sign Mercer for 3 cheap years with Luke Hughes needing a contract at the end of this year, Simon Nemec the year after and Nico next.
Brisson dropped the ball on the Mercer deal.... probably too busy having a wet dream over the up coming Luke Hughes contract.
A lot of things that make someone a great penalty-killer are not things you see great 5v5 defenders doing. Namely, icing the puck at all costs, selling out to block shots, and simply killing time by forcing outside passes. None of these things are good attributes at 5v5 but will make someone an excellent penalty killer. You don't need high hockey IQ to be a good penalty killer, you just need hustle and the willingness to block shots.I don't understand. He's poor defensively even strength but a good penalty killer? I think if you look at the metrics, you'll find he's above average defensively even strength.