Proposal: NJ-CGY (After the Season)

ChicksDigTheTrap

No quick fixes, no cutting corners and no cheating
Sep 16, 2018
4,945
5,240
Springsteen Country
Makes sense, and I can absolutely understand why that would be their stance. I just wonder if it wavers if a player the calibre of Tkachuk, at 24 years old, changes that tune or not. Fits in age wise with the core you've drafted imo.
Love him as a player and he is exactly what the Devils need, but I cannot see him agreeing to a deal with the Devils that would make sense for the Devils long term. If the Devils traded what it would take, plus the QO he has, he would be very difficult for the Devils to deal with from a contract perspective because he holds all the leverage.

I just do not see it as something that is realistic at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flames Fanatic

Ainsy01

Registered User
Jun 12, 2014
1,203
636
This is an interesting idea I had after the season:

To NJ:
Matthew Tkachuk
Oliver Kylington

To CGY:
NJ's 2022 1st (~5th overall)
Damon Severson
Pavel Zacha

Plenty of smoke that Tkachuk may not want to re-sign in Calgary. Calgary gets a 2022 top 5 pick to compensate the loss of him and a very good top 4 RD in Severson who will likely be more than ok with re-signing in Western Canada (where he's from). NJ desperately needs a skilled, physical winger to play with Jack or Nico and he has ties to Fitzgerald. Flame away! (pun intended)

Where?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChicksDigTheTrap

Ainsy01

Registered User
Jun 12, 2014
1,203
636
CGY wont be trading chucky for futures. It would be a top 6 center or right winger of the same Ilke. First, second and 3rd options are to re-sign him.
 

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
Don't the rules allow Calgary to be negotiating now with Tkachuk on a long term deal? NJ went for early no muss no fuss agreements with Hughes and Hischier. Presumably Calgary would do the same with Tkachuk? If he won't sign long term with Calgary, why would he do so in NJ absent some sort of massive overpay? If you can't get Tkachuk with a deal in place for him, it will obviously impact his trade value. To a contender he's still worth a first and a good prospect easily. To a NJ he's not a good trade acquisition without a contract.
 

Canadian Canuck

Hughes4Calder
Jul 30, 2013
14,226
3,973
Kamloops BC
hey bugs

look garland is a nice player. but he doesn't come with a cheap contract. if his production doesn't rebound to what it was with the yotes he is slightly overpaid, which dampers his trade value. smith had an impressive rookie season, but his second season hasn't been good so far. as long as he is playing on elc, he is cheap regardless.

so with the right fit on both sides and some small additions you could probably create a fair proposal with those two pieces. one team receiving a long term signed wing at his peak, the other receives cap savings and a potential second pairing puck moving d, who can also quarterback a pp unit, for their future.

now you added on one side the nj 2022 first round pick and on the other a third round pick. the devils pick will be a guaranteed top 10 selection, which by itself has much more trade value than garland and the 3rd combined. this is a looney tunes level proposal.
Garland literally just got traded for the 10th overall pick. He’s been Vancouver’s top 5v5 player all season and a Top 6 player with the same if not better “production” then the Yotes. You clearly only stat watch and haven’t seen him this season. The fact that you think he’s on an expensive contract is bonkers. He’s paid perfectly for what he is, a feisty, hardworking, 25 year old top six forward. Is a 1st+Smith for Garland+3rd an overpay? Maybe, but we have zero reason to trade him otherwise he’s locked up long term at a SOLID contract.
 

Canadian Canuck

Hughes4Calder
Jul 30, 2013
14,226
3,973
Kamloops BC
I would do Ty Smith for Conor Garland straight up. Both are overrated and underperforming.

If you think NJ will give up an unprotected first for Garland, that's hilarious.
Hahahaha. What’s hilarious is you thinking my Garland is overrated and underperforming. Are you blind or just haven’t watched a single Canucks game? He’s the Best 5v5 player on the roster :laugh: T.Smith straight up? YIKES lol
 

TBF1972

Registered User
May 19, 2018
8,349
6,828
Garland literally just got traded for the 10th overall pick. He’s been Vancouver’s top 5v5 player all season and a Top 6 player with the same if not better “production” then the Yotes. You clearly only stat watch and haven’t seen him this season. The fact that you think he’s on an expensive contract is bonkers. He’s paid perfectly for what he is, a feisty, hardworking, 25 year old top six forward. Is a 1st+Smith for Garland+3rd an overpay? Maybe, but we have zero reason to trade him otherwise he’s locked up long term at a SOLID contract.
actually the 9th overall just for the signing rights of garland

and then ...

... there was this little side transaction

OEL (12% retained)

for

3m cap dump
3m cap dump
6m cap dump
2nd round pick
7th round pick

this thread is about a devils fan making an offer for tkachuk. you come in and offer garland for a complete looney return.

your offer isn't welcomed. now please close the door.
 

Canadian Canuck

Hughes4Calder
Jul 30, 2013
14,226
3,973
Kamloops BC
actually the 9th overall just for the signing rights of garland

and then ...

... there was this little side transaction

OEL (12% retained)

for

3m cap dump
3m cap dump
6m cap dump
2nd round pick
7th round pick

this thread is about a devils fan making an offer for tkachuk. you come in and offer garland for a complete looney return.

your offer isn't welcomed. now please close the door.
Wasn’t a looney return at all. Don’t reply then?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad