Confirmed with Link: Nils Lundkvist to DAL for 2023 Protected 1st

TS Quint

Stop writing “I mean” in your posts.
Sep 8, 2012
8,599
6,145
Thanks for the info Stars fans! I wish you luck! Unless you play the Jets or Wings, then I wish you shitty reffing and heavy legs! ;)
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Satan

FirstRowUpperDeck

Registered User
May 20, 2014
5,571
1,577
Arlington, TX
The "heavy legs" comment above reminded me of another segment by Jankow. The Stars just submitted availability dates for the AAC for next year, working with the Mavs and the arena itself, for concerts, etc. That seems early, but these things do take time.

They went on to say that they still have the worst travel schedule in the league and that every year they get a chance to review the draft of the schedule. They feel they really get an unfair share of back to backs with them having dead legs and the other team being well rested. They are allowed to challenge the schedule somewhat and the NHL tries to accommodate them. They say they save their challenges for division teams, and don't mind playing Eastern Conference teams under poor circumstances as much. It would seem the league does have a lot of competing needs when drawing up those schedules.

Lastly, Nill went on and on about the value of the decentralized draft, including maybe every city getting a draft party for its fans. Of course, at the end the real (I believe) reason comes out in the end......taking 30+ employees to the draft city can be a major expense. Just like households have to re-engineer their budgets every so often, so do NHL franchises and going to the draft sounds like $100K or more down the tubes, LOL.

I am also amazed that a new franchise would cost a billion. All the franchise fees go to existing teams, or over $30 Mil each, which probably feels like one year of TV rights or so. I haven't seen and NHL team financial sheet for a while, but I doubt many really make money, at least based on old ones. If the sale price of a typical biz is either one year revenues or 3-7 years profits, a Billion doesn't sound right to me in normal biz terms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redbeardtx

Captain Awesome

Registered User
Mar 29, 2008
6,761
1,087
Long Beach, CA
The "heavy legs" comment above reminded me of another segment by Jankow. The Stars just submitted availability dates for the AAC for next year, working with the Mavs and the arena itself, for concerts, etc. That seems early, but these things do take time.

They went on to say that they still have the worst travel schedule in the league and that every year they get a chance to review the draft of the schedule. They feel they really get an unfair share of back to backs with them having dead legs and the other team being well rested. They are allowed to challenge the schedule somewhat and the NHL tries to accommodate them. They say they save their challenges for division teams, and don't mind playing Eastern Conference teams under poor circumstances as much. It would seem the league does have a lot of competing needs when drawing up those schedules.

Lastly, Nill went on and on about the value of the decentralized draft, including maybe every city getting a draft party for its fans. Of course, at the end the real (I believe) reason comes out in the end......taking 30+ employees to the draft city can be a major expense. Just like households have to re-engineer their budgets every so often, so do NHL franchises and going to the draft sounds like $100K or more down the tubes, LOL.

I am also amazed that a new franchise would cost a billion. All the franchise fees go to existing teams, or over $30 Mil each, which probably feels like one year of TV rights or so. I haven't seen and NHL team financial sheet for a while, but I doubt many really make money, at least based on old ones. If the sale price of a typical biz is either one year revenues or 3-7 years profits, a Billion doesn't sound right to me in normal biz terms.
Cheap f***s can definitely afford to pay $100k to go to the draft every year, they probably underpay those 30 poor bastards by miles more than that. The $1B figure also shocked me a little, but the NHL is probably more profitable than it's ever been, so I could see it being plausible. Or it's just a f*** off price, to see if anyone is crazy enough to pay it. It's not like there'd be a rush to add a new franchise, there are a lot of teams as it is, and the more you add, the fewer get into the playoffs every year (unless they change the format).
 

Frozen Failure

They got business in my hockey, and I hate it.
Nov 13, 2007
7,091
478
DFW
Why have the franchise spend 100k going to the draft when they could make money hosting a draft party in house.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redbeardtx

serp

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
21,040
13,011
He's been a bit better than last year but not great. Semi-regularly gets scratched for Joel Hanley and when he's in he gets the least minutes on the team and by alot. Harley has pretty much taken over all the secondary offensive duties behind Heiskanen at this point
 

Troy McClure

Should’ve drafted Makar
Mar 12, 2002
48,956
16,873
South of Heaven
He's been a bit better than last year but not great. Semi-regularly gets scratched for Joel Hanley and when he's in he gets the least minutes on the team and by alot. Harley has pretty much taken over all the secondary offensive duties behind Heiskanen at this point
Harley is a year younger but took Lundkvist's job last season. This season, Harley continues to grow, and Lundkvist remains in neutral.

The only reason Lundkvist gets the attention he does is because of his age and draft position. It's not because of anything he does on the ice. If he was a 4th round pick, people wouldn't be clamoring for him to play given what he does when he plays.

It sucks. Sucks a lot. If Lundkvist actually did step up and be the guy Nill wanted, it would solve so many problems for the defense.
 

Elysian

Emo Stars Fan
Dec 4, 2011
12,263
5,260
Norton, OH
Harley is a year younger but took Lundkvist's job last season. This season, Harley continues to grow, and Lundkvist remains in neutral.

The only reason Lundkvist gets the attention he does is because of his age and draft position. It's not because of anything he does on the ice. If he was a 4th round pick, people wouldn't be clamoring for him to play given what he does when he plays.

It sucks. Sucks a lot. If Lundkvist actually did step up and be the guy Nill wanted, it would solve so many problems for the defense.
Unfortunately he's the only defenseman on this roster expected to not make a single mistake. Hard to excel under that pressure.
 

Satan

MIGHTY
Apr 13, 2010
92,221
14,360
Lapland
Thomas Harley is eating his lunch - Nils will hopefully find success in Sweden next year. The coaches saw it last year but he's not good. Giving him more ice time isn't going to change that.

1702900010586.png
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Troy McClure

Klockis

Loyalty personified
Mar 21, 2013
3,013
538
Sweden
Worst trade of all time. He failed badly in NY I still dont understand why we went for him. Most of ours ahl guys would be better.
Eh, it was a decent bet. He looked promising in the SHL, had a cheap comntact and fit perfectly in our core age group. Scouts and GM's will miss but you have to take risks if you want to win.

I think he can be a decent player on a team were he gets plenty of chances and playing time. He just doesn't have a role on our win-now team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elysian and LT

Magic Mittens

Registered User
Nov 2, 2006
7,126
3,489
Calgary
Worst trade of all time. He failed badly in NY I still dont understand why we went for him. Most of ours ahl guys would be better.

Can't say I feel the same way, he's young and has lots of potential. We would of gotten a similar player if we kept the pick and draft near the end of the first round.

Also, you can't really say he failed in NYR, he only played 20 something games. Not everyone steps into the NHL and makes it.

I still feel Nils can be a 5/6, but like everyone says, he just needs to play
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad