rangerfan_79
Registered User
- Jun 1, 2007
- 762
- 299
I would try him in goal first.Think he can play center?
I would try him in goal first.Think he can play center?
If he works out, we could trade Georgiev and a conditional 7th for Auston Matthews.I would try him in goal first.
And of course Leetch. But everyone knew as soon as you saw him skate first shift. He was amazing.We need to keep him. I got a really good feeling about him. Last time I had this Same feeling was Lundqvist and before that Kovalev.
Here's his assist:
Lundkvist got some good reviews on his play too:
Sounds like he dominated that game
Call up?He was. It wasn't necessarily his best game but he was among the better ones. I expect him to continue this all season and get a call up soon
Call up?
Cool. Thought I'd missed him somehow playing for an Allsvenskan team or something.Yes, for the national team
Is it just me or does it seem like Lundkvist is really good at keeping the puck from sailing high on his one-timers? idk, maybe it's just the replays we're seeing instead of the ones we're not, but that kind of hard, low shot is excellent at creating juicy rebounds, which NHL scorers are going to be able to thrive on
He's a stud prospect. Said it many times. It is a disgrace he isn't ranked in the top 10 prospect wise by every scouting service. Makes DeAngelo totally expendable.
A prospect who has never touched a toe onto NA ice makes a 60 point, 24 year old RD expendable. AmazingMakes DeAngelo totally expendable.
A prospect who has never touched a toe onto NA ice makes a 60 point, 24 year old RD expendable. Amazing
But is it a false argument? There's a ton to like about Lundkvist. But as far as being an NHLer, he's a complete unknown, at this point.we need to stop with this false argument. Trouba & Fox make him expendable because you can compare the value of ADA on 3D vs filling a bigger need. Nils Lundkvist has the potential to back-fill the position to minimize the downgrade to RD to improve another area but he is NOT why he is expendable.
But is it a false argument? There's a ton to like about Lundkvist. But as far as being an NHLer, he's a complete unknown, at this point.
we need to stop with this false argument. Trouba & Fox make him expendable because you can compare the value of ADA on 3D vs filling a bigger need. Nils Lundkvist has the potential to back-fill the position to minimize the downgrade to RD to improve another area but he is NOT why he is expendable.
What makes him "behind" Fox? He actually played more time per game than Fox did.I love Lundkvist as a prospect and there are tons to like. but we wouldn't be having the conversation if ADA wasn't behind Trouba and Fox.