Proposal: Nick Robertson for Samuel Fagemo

[yzerman]

Two players who should benefit and kickstart their career with a new environment.

So what do you think of this proposal?

Click to read more...

 

[Mrfenn92]

Don’t see the leafs doing this. Fagemo hit waivers twice last year

 

[Dion TheFluff]

Robertson is 2 years younger and has atleast shown he can be productive at the NHL level if given an opportunity. Hard pass from the Leafs.

 

[Oddbob]

Fagemo is waiver fodder with no value, while Robertson has some.

 

[Acetylene]

While I agree that Robertson needs a change, The Leafs can surely get a better return. Leafs says no.

 

[TheKrebsCycle]

Pretty brutal .

 

[BonMorrison]

Leafs can just get him on waivers.

 

[LEAFANFORLIFE23]

Try making a real proposal

 

[John Garretts KD]

Not saying either team does it, but how about Podkolzin for Robertson?

 

[The Devilish Buffoon]

Fagemo would be a nice little add-on, valued at around a 6th or 7th rounder, to tack on to a serious offer. Might tip the scales. But nothing more

 

[Guitpik]

Don’t see the leafs doing this. Fagemo hit waivers twice last year

Kings would do the same with Robertson, so this whole suggestion is pointless.

 

[CarlSneep]

Kaliyev likely makes more sense for this but realistically both teams would probably prefer a draft pick

 

[BKarchitect]

Robertson has his warts, is a long ways from being a guy you can count on in the playoffs, and isn’t gonna have a ton of trade value but at least he’s made the transition from AHL high-flyer to productive NHLer. Fagemo has yet to prove he’s anything more than a AAAA player.

This wouldn’t even be remotely interesting for the Leafs.

 

[hamzarocks]

Robertson for Tomasino from the preds is what I would hope leafs target

A Change of scenery type trade for two skilled players who cant/dont want to try to fight for a top 6 spot on their current teams

 

[BlueBaron]

Pass. We need him to play for a full season and earn some value

 

[Mrfenn92]

Kings would do the same with Robertson, so this whole suggestion is pointless.

Ok

 

[Dion TheFluff]

Not saying either team does it, but how about Podkolzin for Robertson?

would rather hold onto to Robertson. Still believe he could develop into a top 6 forward if given the proper opportunity.

 

[Voodoo Glow Skulls]

would rather hold onto to Robertson. Still believe he could develop into a top 6 forward if given the proper opportunity.

I thought he requested a trade?

 

[Maurice of Orange]

Fagemo scored 43 goals in the AHL last season despite only playing in 50 AHL games good enough for 2nd in the AHL in goals.

Fagemo’s has an awesome shot and his hand eye coordination is above average but Fagemo’s problem is he gets pushed off the puck very easily and his defensive play at the NHL level leaves much to be desired, which is why he ended up back in the American League.

Fagemo will get another shot to make the Kings opening night roster but if he is beaten out by his competition in TC/Preseason, Sam could end up on waivers yet again.

 

[Oddbob]

Fagemo would be a nice little add-on, valued at around a 6th or 7th rounder, to tack on to a serious offer. Might tip the scales. But nothing more

Or just get him on waivers for nothing.

 

[The Devilish Buffoon]

Or just get him on waivers for nothing.

Sure. Or, if they like him and LA likes Robertson, LA could trade a real asset for Robertson and theow Fagemo in as a sweetener. See what I’m getting at?

 

[Oddbob]

Sure. Or, if they like him and LA likes Robertson, LA could trade a real asset for Robertson and theow Fagemo in as a sweetener. See what I’m getting at?

No, because Fagemo doesn't have any value at this point. The "sweetener" would have to be the main piece with Fagemo as a throw-in. Fagemo cleared twice last year, so if they were interested they would have taken him in either time.

No team is trading a player with value, for a player with no value with something minor tacked on.

 

[cyris]

I thought he requested a trade?

And that means he had to be traded?

 

[The Devilish Buffoon]

No, because Fagemo doesn't have any value at this point. The "sweetener" would have to be the main piece with Fagemo as a throw-in. Fagemo cleared twice last year, so if they were interested they would have taken him in either time.

No team is trading a player with value, for a player with no value with something minor tacked on.

That is literally what I am suggesting.

If LA is willing to meet Toronto’s price (i.e “a real asset”), Fagemo might be, at best, a minimally attractive throw-in.

 

[Dion TheFluff]

I thought he requested a trade?

doesn't mean they have to move him.