Value of: Nick Paul to Edmonton

The Devilish Buffoon

Registered User
Dec 24, 2018
12,708
11,497
A third and 5th is like a late 2nd, so we're just arguing semantics here.
Not to mention that in no world does a late 3rd move you up from a late 2nd to a late 1st, and not to mention that Goodrow had less of the all-important scoring pedigree that Mr. Cyclone is touting (while playing just as much).

Goodrow is better, but I am sure Mr. Cyclone can't tell you why.

For forwards 5v5, Nick Paul played the 4th most TOI/Game for Ottawa, was 3rd last year, and 5th the year before that. He plays some of the most minutes on your team for forwards even strength. 10th in 5v5 points/60 for forwards as well on Ottawa. He plays more 5v5 ice time this year than RNH does.
Yeah, and has 2 fewer points at 5v5.

Also, these stats you're citing are literally all wrong.

7th, 4th (with 5 guys within a minute below), 6th from 2019-2020 to now.
 

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
29,678
25,302
East Coast
For forwards 5v5, Nick Paul played the 4th most TOI/Game for Ottawa, was 3rd last year, and 5th the year before that. He plays some of the most minutes on your team for forwards even strength. 10th in 5v5 points/60 for forwards as well on Ottawa. He plays more 5v5 ice time this year than RNH does.
Again, he doesn’t see PP time, sees the most Pk time, and plays on the 3rd line in a shut down role. He does not, I repeat, does not, see the top 6 ES ice time.

Pageau did the exact same for the Sens for years, was always in the top 6 ice time for forwards while playing on the 3rd line. This is no different, from people that actually watch him play.
 

CycloneSweep

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
51,115
42,746
Again, he doesn’t see PP time, sees the most Pk time, and plays on the 3rd line in a shut down role. He does not, I repeat, does not, see the top 6 ES ice time.

Pageau did the exact same for the Sens for years, was always in the top 6 ice time for forwards while playing on the 3rd line. This is no different, from people that actually watch him play.
I guess we will have to wait and see. Im thinking someone will pay in the 3rd rounder range for him if he moves. A contract with him will probably end up in the 1.75-2.5 mill range
 

The Devilish Buffoon

Registered User
Dec 24, 2018
12,708
11,497
I guess we will have to wait and see. Im thinking someone will pay in the 3rd rounder range for him if he moves. A contract with him will probably end up in the 1.75-2.5 mill range

Wanna bet?

Interesting. Didn't know that.
I kinda think it was much ado about nothing... don't think it would burn the bridge. But I definitely don't think we would bring Turris back just to have him back. For a 4th rounder and to be a warm body if we deal some of our current NHLers, though? Sure.
 

Blacephalon

Registered User
Oct 12, 2018
1,165
1,382
Turris + 3rd?

Are conditions based on a player re-signing not allowed anymore? I would make it a conditional third that bumps up to a second if the Oilers could retain him.
Why would the Sens do this? They can get a 2nd without taking any money back
 

The Devilish Buffoon

Registered User
Dec 24, 2018
12,708
11,497
I mean it's all speculation. If the Oilers can agree to terms with him I'd trade a second. And the Turris money is negligble, c'mon. Not even worth arguing over.

Eh, Sens sure as hell ain't taking on an extra $500k or so for free when they can add a similar player for 1/3rd of the cost.

I think the cost for an extended Paul will be higher than just a 2nd. Don't know if we'd even trade him if the best offer is a 3rd, even if he says he won't extend. We do need players and already have a ton of prospects and 6 picks in the top 3 rounds this year.
 

Blacephalon

Registered User
Oct 12, 2018
1,165
1,382
I mean it's all speculation. If the Oilers can agree to terms with him I'd trade a second. And the Turris money is negligble, c'mon. Not even worth arguing over.
Your wrong on both accounts.

Paul will get a second just as a ufa and money does matter to the Sens.

At worst if the best they can get is a third there won’t be any money coming back
 

AddyTheWrath

Registered User
Mar 24, 2015
11,441
20,169
Toronto
Eh, Sens sure as hell ain't taking on an extra $500k or so for free when they can add a similar player for 1/3rd of the cost.

I think the cost for an extended Paul will be higher than just a 2nd. Don't know if we'd even trade him if the best offer is a 3rd, even if he says he won't extend. We do need players and already have a ton of prospects and 6 picks in the top 3 rounds this year.
I mean Seattle retained 1 mil on Jarnkrok for a 7th, so you're not getting much for taking Turris back. The value of an extended Paul will depend entirely on whether the Sens have any confidence they could get him to re-sign in Ottawa and the number of teams he'd even be interested in going to. Don't want to speculate too much there.
Your wrong on both accounts.

Paul will get a second just as a ufa and money does matter to the Sens.

At worst if the best they can get is a third there won’t be any money coming back
Sure. 3rd round pick for Paul is fine with me, if he's interested in returning to the Oilers.
 

The Devilish Buffoon

Registered User
Dec 24, 2018
12,708
11,497
I mean Seattle retained 1 mil on Jarnkrok for a 7th, so you're not getting much for taking Turris back. The value of an extended Paul will depend entirely on whether the Sens have any confidence they could get him to re-sign in Ottawa and the number of teams he'd even be interested in going to. Don't want to speculate too much there.

Sure. 3rd round pick for Paul is fine with me, if he's interested in returning to the Oilers.
Just because that's the price for Seattle, doesn't mean its the price for Ottawa. You will be hard-pressed to find a single Sens deal where we take on money for assets. If the Sens won't get much for taking Turris (and hell, maybe even if they would), they just won't take him. Simple as that.

Paul won't be dealt for a 3rd, extension or not.
 

LeProspector

AINEC
Feb 14, 2017
5,399
6,270
A 2nd rounder for a a 26 year old UFA who has never hit above 20 points (25-20 point pace)? Really? That seems quite high. PRobably closer to a late 3rd or a 4th +6th or something
Did you see what Chariot and Jarncrok went for? A second for Paul is more than fair.
 

The Devilish Buffoon

Registered User
Dec 24, 2018
12,708
11,497
Elliotte Friedman just said in an interview that he's heard from multiple sources that Nick Paul will be a close to 3m player starting next season.
 

Seachd

Registered User
Mar 16, 2002
25,249
9,881
Just because that's the price for Seattle, doesn't mean its the price for Ottawa. You will be hard-pressed to find a single Sens deal where we take on money for assets. If the Sens won't get much for taking Turris (and hell, maybe even if they would), they just won't take him. Simple as that.

Maybe, but there's also a factor that trumps what Paul's value to Ottawa is - cap space. Taking back extremely little salary at the deadline in order to get assets for upcoming free agents is just a cost of doing business now. If Ottawa isn't willing to do that, they (strangely) impose a limit on themselves for trade partners.
 

The Devilish Buffoon

Registered User
Dec 24, 2018
12,708
11,497
Maybe, but there's also a factor that trumps what Paul's value to Ottawa is - cap space. Taking back extremely little salary at the deadline in order to get assets for upcoming free agents is just a cost of doing business now. If Ottawa isn't willing to do that, they (strangely) impose a limit on themselves for trade partners.

Ottawa 1000% imposes limits on themselves, but Nick Paul's remaining $275k caphit isn't gonna cause too many issues.
 

DingDongCharlie

Registered User
Sep 12, 2010
11,690
9,792
I'd do the 2nd + Turris as a cheap dump. Melnyk/Dorion can send him to the minors (they might enjoy that), the cap hit prorated and than buried is nothing. If they are getting a 2nd for a player going to otherwise walk I can't see Turris being a sticking point.
 

belair

Win it for Ben!
Apr 9, 2010
39,607
23,310
Canada
I'd do the 2nd + Turris as a cheap dump. Melnyk/Dorion can send him to the minors (they might enjoy that), the cap hit prorated and than buried is nothing. If they are getting a 2nd for a player going to otherwise walk I can't see Turris being a sticking point.
Turris is on LTIR with what I can only assume is long COVID. Adding him to the deal wouldn't do anything to Edmonton's cap situation.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad