Value of: Nick Jensen

Status
Not open for further replies.

Langway

In den Wolken
Jul 7, 2006
32,929
10,072
The Caps probably need to extend Jensen. Hard to imagine Gustafsson & TVR will be adequate enough going forward, even if they were to add a Chychrun to the mix to offset the loss of Orlov.

A second plus would be decent but unless Jensen is demanding a lot of term they're likely better off keeping him. Who really needs a second pair RD? Toronto? Maybe Colorado? Dallas?
 
  • Like
Reactions: crab

Hivemind

We're Touched
Oct 8, 2010
37,446
14,081
Philadelphia
Jensen is a player I prefer they keep rather than trade, but it will depend on how much term he's looking for on his next deal (which could be his last meaningful NHL contract, given that he's 32).

If he's traded, he's probably worth similar to what he was when the Capitals traded for him a while ago. 2nd + B prospect.
 

CapsFrontOffice

Registered User
Jul 8, 2014
521
303
What's he worth if Washington decides to move him? Saw some Caps fans say he's worth a 1st. Not so sure myself.
Caps fan here, not worth a first but to a contender that is not Boston or Toronto, he is worth a 1st for both sides.
 

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,387
9,655
I'd be willing to give up Logan Stanley, Nikita Chibrikov and a 3rd round pick for him. Maybe another pick for Eller. I've seen him skate and that's the kind of defenseman the Jets need to play with Josh Morrissey right now.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,665
17,092
Victoria
If Toronto is looking to add on the blueline now, Jensen is the guy. Very solid defensively, but mobile enough to extend OZ possessions and create chances. Would fit in very well with how Toronto plays.

Brodie/Jensen - high leverage defensive minutes
Giordano/Holl - secondary leverage minutes
Rielly/Liljegren - sheltered offensive minutes
 

SherVaughn30

Registered User
Jan 12, 2010
5,622
3,656
Los Angeles
What's he worth if Washington decides to move him? Saw some Caps fans say he's worth a 1st. Not so sure myself.
If there is a bidding war then yes. There is always more demand for RD, with less supply. A '23 2nd rounder should be right. If a team gets desperate, then a 1st rounder in a weaker draft or if the team is ranked like the Bruins are.
 

Roshi

Registered User
Feb 7, 2013
2,070
2,078
Finland
If we get the Oilers 2nd + 4th thats suggested here id be fine. No problem taking a 20 game look at Puljujarvi in a different scenery either.

But also fine if we keep him for resigning purposes. That should be priority, but obviously depends on what he is demanding.
 

SherVaughn30

Registered User
Jan 12, 2010
5,622
3,656
Los Angeles
In the Oilers case I don't think we'd be willing to part with a 1st for him. Not sure about other teams. I could see a 2nd, a 4th and Puljujarvi to make the cap work for Jensen with 50% retention.
If you want Jensen with max 50% of his cap hit retained($1.25 million), then it will cost you a 1st. Max retained of a players contract so they fit within a teams salary cap, is costly. It's why you don't see a lot of 50% retained in trades, unless a 3rd team gets involved. 3-way trades can get complicated and fall apart.
 

Puckstuff

Registered User
May 12, 2010
11,478
3,746
Milton
If Toronto is looking to add on the blueline now, Jensen is the guy. Very solid defensively, but mobile enough to extend OZ possessions and create chances. Would fit in very well with how Toronto plays.

Brodie/Jensen - high leverage defensive minutes
Giordano/Holl - secondary leverage minutes
Rielly/Liljegren - sheltered offensive minutes
Why do you have our 2 best D-men not named Brodie getting sheltered minutes?

If the leafs traded for a RD it would be Holl sitting not Sandin.

It would be

Rielly-Brodie
Giordano-Liljegren
Sandin-Jensen
 

SherVaughn30

Registered User
Jan 12, 2010
5,622
3,656
Los Angeles
Whether it's with the Caps or another team that gives Jensen a new contract, it will be something like 3 years @ $4 million per year. The $2.5 million cap hit he's had with the Caps, was a bargain. 2nd pairing d-men normally don't get paid that low of a cap hit.
 

Puckstuff

Registered User
May 12, 2010
11,478
3,746
Milton
If you want Jensen with max 50% of his cap hit retained($1.25 million), then it will cost you a 1st. Max retained of a players contract so they fit within a teams salary cap, is costly. It's why you don't see a lot of 50% retained in trades, unless a 3rd team gets involved. 3-way trades can get complicated and fall apart.
I’d offer any prospect in the leafs system not named Minten or Knies for Jensen. Or I would offer a 2024 1st lol.
 

SherVaughn30

Registered User
Jan 12, 2010
5,622
3,656
Los Angeles
Why do you have our 2 best D-men not named Brodie getting sheltered minutes?

If the leafs traded for a RD it would be Holl sitting not Sandin.

It would be

Rielly-Brodie
Giordano-Liljegren
Sandin-Jensen
Jensen playing on the 3rd d-pairing? He's well suited for 2nd pairing. If the Leafs were to do that, then they should go for a lesser cost d-man.
 

Puckstuff

Registered User
May 12, 2010
11,478
3,746
Milton
Jensen playing on the 3rd d-pairing? He's well suited for 2nd pairing. If the Leafs were to do that, then they should go for a lesser cost d-man.
Doesn’t Washington want to re-tool not re-build? I’m surprised Jensen is available. Are they planning to blow it up completely? Who is going to play defence for Washington next year?
 

SherVaughn30

Registered User
Jan 12, 2010
5,622
3,656
Los Angeles
I’d offer any prospect in the leafs system not named Minten or Knies for Jensen. Or I would offer a 2024 1st lol.
Caps will gladly take the Leafs '24 1st. I'm just not sure Dubas will be willing to do that for a rental, unless Jensen signs a new deal with them. Sounds like Muzzin's career could be over with that spine injury?

Doesn’t Washington want to re-tool not re-build? I’m surprised Jensen is available. Are they planning to blow it up completely? Who is going to play defence for Washington next year?
If Jensen can't be extended before the deadline, the Caps run too much of a risk losing him for nothing. It's the reason Orlov was traded. Orlov wants 6 years and the Caps were only offering 3 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Filthy Dangles

Puckstuff

Registered User
May 12, 2010
11,478
3,746
Milton
Caps will gladly take the Leafs '24 1st. I'm just not sure Dubas will be willing to do that for a rental, unless Jensen signs a new deal with them. Sounds like Muzzin's career could be over with that spine injury?


If Jensen can't be extended before the deadline, the Caps run too much of a risk losing him for nothing. It's the reason Orlov was traded. Orlov wants 6 years and the Caps were only offering 3 years.
Muzzin is done for this season and playoffs. Not sure about his career but possibly career ending. Jensen would be a solid upgrade on Holl.
 

rockinghockey

Registered User
Oct 22, 2008
9,069
229
I would like to see him in EDM plus he is signed for next year.2nd Pulju. Add a 4 for cap retention.it is not like it will be much money and then 5 to another team for 50% retention. Gives EDM a bit more money for a depth centre.
 

StephenPeat

Registered User
Jul 19, 2015
4,654
1,617
Not worth a 1st, maybe a 3rd + 6th
This is objectively stupid. Washington will not trade Jensen (a pretty clear Top 4 DMan whose competition metrics are pretty close to elite) for a 3rd + 6th.

I’d peg his value as a 2nd+ but I’m leaning towards Washington trying to keep him, his style of play tends to age well. He’ll be a cheap, effective contributor for the Capitals or someone else for several more seasons.
 

Random schmoe

Random fan with their own opinions
Sponsor
Feb 13, 2019
1,117
1,272
I would like to see him in EDM plus he is signed for next year.2nd Pulju. Add a 4 for cap retention.it is not like it will be much money and then 5 to another team for 50% retention. Gives EDM a bit more money for a depth centre.
Jensen isn't signed for next year, he's going to be a UFA after this season.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,665
17,092
Victoria
Why do you have our 2 best D-men not named Brodie getting sheltered minutes?

If the leafs traded for a RD it would be Holl sitting not Sandin.

It would be

Rielly-Brodie
Giordano-Liljegren
Sandin-Jensen
Because Rielly is not that good. He is so massively overrated it's not even funny. Absolutely no exaggeration, he might be the single worst rush defender in the NHL. Any 1v1 rush against is an automatic high-danger scoring chance. I even see him routinely turn 1v2s into scoring chances against. He is a massive liability defensively and all the data, analytics, and eye test support this.

I'd argue a large degree of his production is also just because of opportunity. He's force-fed ES offensive minutes and PP1 time. Anyone will put up points in that situation. He is a great skater, which helps him activate and jump in the rush, but he doesn't have the awareness to be a real elite chance creator from the backend, like a Makar or Fox or Karlsson. He should be used in sheltered minutes.

Holl does a lot of good things that casual fans don't see. He gets to the puck on retrievals and moves it. He turns rushes against into dump-ins. He's a top-four defenseman.
 

Holtbyisms

Matt Irwin is a legit talent
Sponsor
Jul 1, 2012
7,459
4,305
Bedford, PA
Jensen will return slightly more than what he was traded for. He was a late bloomer to begin with and only became a better player in DC. I'd say he goes for a 2nd and a talented prospect(bowey was a bust at the time of the trade to DET) or if the caps aren't interested in prospects per the "quick retool" rumors then I'd say the price becomes a 1st for draft capital to trade back out. Maybe he's packaged with Eller like the Orlov Hathaway deal for a 1st and another pick. Maybe a 3rd.
 

aonb

Registered User
Oct 26, 2013
1,757
779
looking at that jeannot trade and people saying jensen isn't worth a 1st.. interesting, that's for sure
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Jozay
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad