Celly4Celebrini
pray
- Jul 10, 2010
- 5,751
- 735
his value is only what others will pay. if you only have 3 teams he'll go to offering similar packages, thats his valueThat doesn't change his value, only how much of that value you can extract
his value is only what others will pay. if you only have 3 teams he'll go to offering similar packages, thats his valueThat doesn't change his value, only how much of that value you can extract
Don't quote me on this, but most things switch/roll over when the league year changes on July 1. I imagine that would probably also include salary retention slots.
Thanks Mike!
EK65 has another 4 seasons (through June 2027).
Contract year ends nominally June 30.
TSN reports that the deal is Bonino for 5th and 7th (no 3rd team retention). Still not seeing official announcements. 2022-23 NHL Trade Tracker
Sharks can’t take back literally any contract from PIT to get that 5th? Give us Archibald or Heinen and a 5th.
Where is that chance? Reimer? Probably not better than a 5th. Labanc? Probably not better than a 5th and would be for two years.You seem to enjoy complaining no matter what they do. Taking back salary limits what they can possibly do today. They have a chance at getting better assets than a 5th rounder.
It can be both.Or maybe they want to dump on MG?
Where is that chance? Reimer? Probably not better than a 5th. Labanc? Probably not better than a 5th and would be for two years.
I love all of these posts that basically say “YOU JUST COMPLAIN TO COMPLAIN THERES OBVIOUSLY OTHER SOLUTIONS!!!!” Then refuse to give other solutions. I actually don’t complain about everything the Sharks do. Grier is just really bad so a lot of his moves have been really bad so I have said they are really bad.
Was I complaining about the Namestnikov move though? Cause no I wasn’t.Grier isn't really that bad. Turning a waiver pick up into a 4th is decent business. As for the Bonino trade, it hasn't even gone through yet.
Yeah, any talk about Grier being bad so far is either hyperbolic, highly reactionary, lacking in context, or a combination of those things.Grier isn't really that bad. Turning a waiver pick up into a 4th is decent business. As for the Bonino trade, it hasn't even gone through yet.
Was I complaining about the Namestnikov move though? Cause no I wasn’t.
and as I said if the reports are true it’s bad in the Bonino trade.
And I’ve laid out the trades that I think were good and trades that I think were bad. He is a bad GM considering the bad moves highly outnumber the good moves. Considering there’s about 4 good moves, maybe 2 moderate moves, and about 8-10 bad moves. Including signings here.You called him a bad GM so I pointed out something good he did. And we've all had lengthy discussions about the Meier deal and how he did well compared to other teams selling comparable players.
Grier has shown he can build an elite tank team, which is exactly what the Sharks need right now.And I’ve laid out the trades that I think were good and trades that I think were bad. He is a bad GM considering the bad moves highly outnumber the good moves. Considering there’s about 4 good moves, maybe 2 moderate moves, and about 8-10 bad moves. Including signings here.
The only comebacks on the bad moves too are massive appeals to authority and that he’s doing players a favor. So basically speculation and opinions and not facts. Obviously this is all opinion based from both sides but I’m still providing context while every single response to mine isn’t or claims I say things that I never did.