Ok a serious response...
I agree we need some transparency, even at the 'cost' of some privacy. However, this may never come in the form some folks are looking for. If he did something wrong, he should face consequences, but part of that process is letting an investigation take place.
However, if he did nothing criminal, what would it take? If the team is simply staying mum because they don't know which one is true, then isn't it fair to give some time? I mean, would a statement from Seattle PD help? If they said 'there is no criminal investigation', would it still seem like a cover up by the team?