I just don’t get why the Avs would be concerned from losing a termination. They have legit grounds based on what an SPC requires.
(e) to conduct himself on and off the rink according to the highest standards ofhonesty, morality, fair play and sportsmanship, and to refrain from conduct detrimental to thebest interest of the Club, the League or professional hockey generally.
He consumed illegal drugs under his own volition while already under watch of the NHL for previously violating their rules.
b) fail, refuse or neglect to render his services hereunder or in any other mannermaterially breach this SPC.
Again, his own actions, by already being in stage 2, which are against the rules, rendered him unable to render his services, because he broke the nhl’s rules and is now in stage 3.
So I’m not understanding why mediation is required and why the Avs would take a penalty cap hit. They have legitimate grounds.
What could Nike’s defense possibly be that would justify his contract not being terminated?
I understand both parties wanting to settle to avoid a long drawn out battle. But for the Avs, a cap hit penalty is quite debilitating.