Rangers ask Trouba for his 15-team no-trade list
Gawd I wish these things were made public
Rangers ask Trouba for his 15-team no-trade list
IIRC, on one of the Roy threads in the Trade Forum, a few relatively reasonable LA fans seemed to agree that he was generally very good—particularly while defending the rush and against the boards. A good (but not great) skater with an average breakout pass but not much offense. But they also agreed that his major glaring weakness—especially for a defensive defenseman—was his play in front of his own net. There were multiple posts along the lines of, “If a tip-in or rebound was scored in front of the net, we all expected to see Roy there, looking like an idiot because he missed his assignment and was just standing around doing nothing when the goal was scored.”
He's a solid UFA option. Projected at 5 x $6 million and could solidify a defensive second pair a la Niskanen.
I understand that being the logic of why he was included, but he was being outscored by actual defensemen during that era. And I'm not just referring to the Ray Bouques, Phil Housleys, and Paul Coffeys that were outscoring everyone. During streak of 3 Selkes within 5 years from 87-92, Carbonneau still had fewer points than fourteen different defensemen including Chris Chelios, Scott Stevens, Gary Suter, and Kevin Hatcher - and it's hard to argue that Guy had a bigger defensive impact on the game than those guys. If guys like Suter and Hatcher aren't in the HHOF, why is a forward who couldn't outscore them in?I agree, but I would also add that Guy is in for his defensive play (or at least reputation) rather than his points production.
Stamkos heading to market. That certainly seems like a bad decision for Tampa
I respect it but also disagree with it strongly.Refreshing when someone thinks outside the box and popular opinion, especially when they realize how important Lindgren was in 2023-24. This is pleasing and should further boost Lindgren for 24-25 season.
I could buy that argument if they hadn’t just traded for 35 year old Ryan McDonagh and his $6.75 million dollar cap hit. They also need to fill out their roster with a little over $5 million to play with and 18 players signed.Very hard disagree. He's not really an instrumental component of that team any more, and is primarily a PP specialist who is going to command way more than he's worth. Making tough decisions to move on from players like this is what makes good teams extend their windows.
Stamkos is also a franchise legend and captain. I get he isn’t the player he once was but he did just put up 40 goals again. You’d think they would treat him with a little more respect
I would disagree with you. It’s clear he wasn’t a priority in their offseason plans. They added more cap dollars for McDonagh, which was a puzzling move at the time. Friedman reported today they were a surprise team poking around on Guentzel.With all due-respect, that is loser talk. He's been treated well and some other team will give him money. The fans will salute him when he returns to TB. He'll enter their ring of honor.
I could buy that argument if they hadn’t just traded for 35 year old Ryan McDonagh and his $6.75 million dollar cap hit. They also need to fill out their roster with a little over $5 million to play with and 18 players signed.
No one is arguing that he isn’t a tier 1 star player any longer. The argument is how the organization pretty much fumbled this one. 8x$3ish million per year is a slap in the face to Stamkos (assuming that’s true but LeBrun is usually pretty reliable) when his ask was reportedly around $4-5 million. $4-$5 million seems like a pretty big discount over what he will likely get on the open market after scoring 40 goals. Tampa will continue to attract free agents, because well who wouldn’t want to live in a nice area with no state income tax. It just seems pretty shitty to low ball a guy who’s been there since he was drafted 15 years ago, especially after trading for McDonagh. The optics aren’t great.Stamkos hasn't been the face of the franchise in Tampa Bay for several years now. Kucherov and Vasilevskiy are bigger stars, and Point has outplayed Stamkos on the ice as well. Bolts fans also remember that sticking with Lecavalier after his decline ultimately hurt the franchise far more than it helped. The fans will be fine with it, and so will players around the league. The Lightning have paid Stamkos over $100M (pre-tax) in his career already, there's no sane free agent who will look at that and claim that TB isn't loyal or doesn't compensate their stars.