HTFN
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2009
- 12,556
- 11,476
only in that sort of EA Sports way where you can sign free agents the game doesn't know what to do with and make a superteam of injured and retired headcases.Isn't MacLellan on record as having had interest in Kane in the past? Reportedly there's still interest around the league. You'd think he'd have to eat some humble pie after all of the drama but I guess that depends on the extent of demand.
I'd probably pass but only if they have better deadline targets in mind. For free it would be hard to rule it out completely. He'd add speed but he's not super well-rounded, has had penalty problems and falls pretty far from an ideal standpoint. But free is free. If he's only going to command a cheap deal that could be waived and buried there's perhaps not much downside to it.
in reality I think the downsides are fairly clear
edit: for the record I'm not saying you have an EA sports way of thinking, just that in this case the on-ice product isn't really the question