Ohashi_Jouzu*
Registered User
Still not seeing the VsX angle when GP and opponent strength are so wildly different for every player's raw numbers. For instance, 4 points in 7 games against 2012 Philadelphia should not be held on the same level as 4 points in 4 games against 1999 Dallas. And you're obviously more likely to have five "deep" runs in the Original Six when 33.3% of teams are in the Finals than you are now.
Isn't this exactly the same for literally every stat in the book, because different teams play in different divisions/conferences against different teams? I think at a certain level you have to "assume" that a lot of the quality of competition "comes out in the wash" by the time you aggregate 5 or more seasons/playoffs into the sample. Otherwise you have to just throw out every single raw stat (goals, assists, GAA, SV%, everything) as "inconclusive and meaningless".
To back up, I agree with you in the strictest theoretical sense, but I believe it would be uselessly cumbersome to come up with detailed enough correction factors to satisfy you for EVERYTHING. By the same token, I think it would be foolish NOT to judge players on some level by their stats, as imperfect as they may be at a "raw" level. I mean, it's mostly just for conversation anyway, but I'm not suggesting that attempts to improve what can be discerned from stats shouldn't be made.