Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 27,992
- 14,905
You’ll have to explain what was held back, since they just follow the rules in the CBA and MOU.maybe the NHL should not have been holding it back so much all these years then
You’ll have to explain what was held back, since they just follow the rules in the CBA and MOU.maybe the NHL should not have been holding it back so much all these years then
I just read that it went up 24 procent one year and it caused a lot of problem, so they made it into maximum 10 procent over 1 year.Seems ridiculous to have the cap go up that much that quickly. Didn't the NBA do that and it caused problems?
You'd think they'd want to keep it lower and eliminate the possibility of escrow.
Well it was obviously bad, with the layoffs they had, then selling off games to recoup some money. There is enough articles out there talking about it, if you care to read them.Well they usually aydont, but if you think of NHL situation in US that hasnt always been the case.
I was referring to the talk about how awful the deal has been to Rogers according to countless posts
i have read over the years, all based on, as far as i have seen opions, no data.
So this new deal, will tell if the old one was awful ok or good.
Give me some links and i read. I havent found them and ive read quite a few on the subjectWell it was obviously bad, with the layoffs they had, then selling off games to recoup some money. There is enough articles out there talking about it, if you care to read them.
If you’re expecting Roger’s to come out and actually say, we made a terrible deal, and got shafted and overpaid on the deal. You’ll be waiting a long time then, especially while in current negotiations for a new deal.
I don't know if it was a problem, but it was the main thing that allowed Durant to go to Golden State.Seems ridiculous to have the cap go up that much that quickly. Didn't the NBA do that and it caused problems?
You'd think they'd want to keep it lower and eliminate the possibility of escrow.