Speculation: NHL gearing up for another round of expansion!

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Drumman44

Kyle Beach Deserved Better
May 2, 2017
1,927
2,769
Not sure how to mesh the feeling of a “watered down” product as compared to how well the game appears to be doing with youth? In Illinois the Blackhawks have had a huge impact on kids playing hockey. Wouldn’t more participation lead to more and better players?

Colloquially it seems NHL forwards are in the best shape they’ve ever been with even third line guys having really great offensive skills.

Or is it true that playing hockey as a kid in Canada is simply out of reach for middle class families?

Also I kind of want to see Toronto get a second team with a more “working class” feel akin to the White Sox of old around here.
 

Bubba88

Toews = Savior
Nov 8, 2009
30,073
809
Bavaria
Bedard is going to have 200 point seasons in 5 years at this rate. I hate the expansion. Building through the draft is going to be rough. How many players from each draft class play even 100 games in the NHL? A dozen?
40 more players get the chance to get to 100 or more games played :D
It will only increase the odds to get more players to play the games. They won't be good, but they get to play :D
 

dj Mahoney

Registered User
Apr 11, 2021
1,490
731
All the more reason to move up in the draft a couple more times to possibly have less players but better players .
 

Beukeboom Fan

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
16,043
1,972
Chicago, IL
Visit site
This league is watered down as it is. Why does Atlanta deserve a 3rd shot?
2 words - expansion fee. You're looking at roughly $2B to split between the 32 owners. They're each going to get a check for roughly $60M. That's the long and short of it.

EDIT- heard the fee is actually $1.2B, so that is about 75+m per owner.
 
Last edited:

x Tame Impala

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2011
28,358
13,236
Houston and Atlanta (Utah as well) are getting teams because they have the corporate sponsorship to buy up tickets 41 games a year. They're not going to put a team in Quebec where they have to rely on 15,000 "die hard" hockey fans to be at 90+% capacity every game. Tickets are expensive and apparently Canadians are feeling the economic squeeze even worse than we are here in the states. It's hard to justify spending hundreds of dollars on a hockey game when money is tight.
 

Hawkaholic

Registered User
Dec 19, 2006
32,082
11,594
London, Ont.
Houston and Atlanta (Utah as well) are getting teams because they have the corporate sponsorship to buy up tickets 41 games a year. They're not going to put a team in Quebec where they have to rely on 15,000 "die hard" hockey fans to be at 90+% capacity every game. Tickets are expensive and apparently Canadians are feeling the economic squeeze even worse than we are here in the states. It's hard to justify spending hundreds of dollars on a hockey game when money is tight.
Quebec doesn't need a team, but a 2nd team in the GTA could easily be supported. I just don't think the Leafs want another team in the area, but it would bring in far more money than a team in AtL or Houston.
 

GIADF

Registered User
Aug 17, 2024
12
15
Quebec doesn't need a team, but a 2nd team in the GTA could easily be supported. I just don't think the Leafs want another team in the area, but it would bring in far more money than a team in AtL or Houston.

How would a second team in the Toronto area bring in more money than Atlanta or Houston?

Their metro populations are all pretty similar. If done right, Atlanta or Houston would bring in far more new fans to the league and revenue with them. Toronto is more just reshuffling the chairs on the deck.
 

DisgruntledHawkFan

Blackhawk Down
Jun 19, 2004
58,376
29,741
South Side
Another gta team would be profitable there's just not much upside for the other owners. Like nobody from Hamilton is gonna decide that now I guess I'll look into this NHL thing.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad