GDT: NHL Free Agent Frenzy 2024

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

BaconNater

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
5,154
3,751
CO
Wonder if the Avs make up for the lack of excitement today by showing the fans a video of Mikko training hard this off-season
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jabubenice

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
65,943
51,542
Takes 2 parties to sign a contract. Obviously this is where they landed. You're giving ideal case scenarios in the Avs favor but you can't force Mitts to sign it.

Plus realistically our window if pretty much closed on 3 years, so better to keep his AAV down in those 3 years then go more term and more money.
The trade value of Mitts at ~1m more for the final 2 seasons is worth more than letting him walk.
 

Murzu

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 23, 2013
6,493
9,688
Finland
The deal signals the long-term ask was around 7. But the 3 years is the entire issue with the contract. If the AAV was closer to 5, it would be a lot better. Or if the AAV was 6.5 but the term was 5 or 6 years, it would be a lot better. The Avs got a poor mix of the two. He's a fantastic player and worth 5.75m, just the structure is off.

Maybe for five years I can see the ask being around 7, maybe a touch more. I feel like years 4, 5, 6 and maybe even 7 would have been extremely expensive.

Let's see if the Avs re-sign him after his deal is done.
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
65,943
51,542
Close to 5 would be too big of an ask. Mitts had arbitration rights. Why wouldnt he get close to 5 in arbitration.
I think he'd get around 5.25m in arbitration. In that case the Avs would have selected 2 year and had a 5.25m for 2 year deal instead.
 

jaisen73

Registered User
Oct 5, 2006
2,563
582
If Nashville gives Stammer 8mil on anything more than 2 years they're insane. He's still a solid player but this is the downswing part of his HOF career.
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
51,350
55,359
Trotz last year: we’re going to retool the right way.

Trotz this year: SIGN ALL THE FREE AGENTS
Should have traded for Marner instead when he had the cap space to do it

Grandpas Stamkos and Marchessault are very unlikely to live up to those contracts.
 

The Pwnerer

Registered User
Jan 27, 2006
7,053
4,809
Preds basically swapped Ryjo/Duchene for Stamkos/ROR. Now that's what I call a good GM.
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Feb 24, 2012
65,943
51,542
Stammer is a negative player 5v5 now, but he can still pop near 20g on the PP. That has some good value (not $8m though). Curious to see how Nashville will deploy him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad