The trade value of Mitts at ~1m more for the final 2 seasons is worth more than letting him walk.Takes 2 parties to sign a contract. Obviously this is where they landed. You're giving ideal case scenarios in the Avs favor but you can't force Mitts to sign it.
Plus realistically our window if pretty much closed on 3 years, so better to keep his AAV down in those 3 years then go more term and more money.
You'd probably get more players to sign here.Avs should seriously consider bringing back Jbara and Gardner when free agency officially opens.
The deal signals the long-term ask was around 7. But the 3 years is the entire issue with the contract. If the AAV was closer to 5, it would be a lot better. Or if the AAV was 6.5 but the term was 5 or 6 years, it would be a lot better. The Avs got a poor mix of the two. He's a fantastic player and worth 5.75m, just the structure is off.
If you can put play drivers around him this can work. Stammer has never really been a play driver or much more than a trigger man with sneaky good passing...I don't really hate it, if you can put the right guys around him.this is bad too
I think he'd get around 5.25m in arbitration. In that case the Avs would have selected 2 year and had a 5.25m for 2 year deal instead.Close to 5 would be too big of an ask. Mitts had arbitration rights. Why wouldnt he get close to 5 in arbitration.
Should have traded for Marner instead when he had the cap space to do itTrotz last year: we’re going to retool the right way.
Trotz this year: SIGN ALL THE FREE AGENTS
That's the same, just in a different year.Preds basically swapped Ryjo/Duchene for Stamkos/ROR. Now that's what I call a good GM.