Apropos of nothing, it would be kind of oddly fitting (given how much this thread alone provoked mostly messages about Atlanta and Quebec) if somewhere in the far-flung future, the NHL did return to Quebec City and their first game was against Atlanta v3.0. I often forget the Nordiques' first NHL game was vs. the Flames...
NHL Expansion back on agenda?
- Thread starter uhlaw97
- Start date
GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 192,934
- 43,450
Attendance means a lot less than it did. Florida was death for attendance for the balance of their existence, and now it’s like that almost never happened. Sure, you need people in the building, but he a good franchise and the people will show, but more importantly, they will watch and they will have corporate support
Elliotte Friedman said last season, it’s in the Houston thread, that he thinks there’s a second Houston group that has motivated Fertitta. But the league still seems to want him more than he wants them. Does he want to own a team just to keep others out? Does he just want a team to get a new building? Or does he want to own a team because he is investing in hockey. That’s the difference between him and Ryan Smith or either Atlanta owner, and even Vegas and Seattle.
There just seems to be a lot of landmines around Houston if they’re going with Fertitta, the idea sounds a lot better but we know nothing about the execution. I’d be worried this is setting up similar to the Thrashers where he may just decide he got the building and give up when he loses interest.
It wasn't the fans it was the ownership that didn't want hockey nor did they want a hockey team in the arena after selling. They never had a chance.
When you have winnipeg and ottawa struggling at times why go back to an even smaller market? There's also very little upside to add to a tv contract which is where all sports are now and the NHL wants to be too.
AtlantaWhaler
Thrash/Preds/Sabres
- Jul 3, 2009
- 20,212
- 3,456
QC failed each time they've had a team. They don't deserve a team.
See, I can post uneducated opinions too.
Tawnos
A guy with a bass
Yep, each time.
And the 1920 relocation of the Bulldogs to Hamilton bears exactly the same relevance to the modern economics of the NHL as the relocation of the Flames to Calgary.... which is to say, no relevance at all.
TheLegend
"Just say it 3 times..."
“I told you so”
Ahh yes….. HF is so full of experts on the subject.
Arizona was a last minute desperation move by the league when Gluckstien and Burke couldn’t get an arena deal done in Minnesota.
They lasted 28 years in spite of a revolving door of bad owners (vetted by the league), and bad decision on arena location and 18 years worth of predictions from same HF “experts” they were “100% sure going to be relocating the following year.”
Frankly speaking if I were a betting man for a living m the last place I would look for wagering advice would be HFBoards.
Now….. If Atlanta puts together a bad ownership group full of wannabes then you’re prediction might come true.
That won’t be Atlanta’s fault as a market. Just like it wasn’t Arizona’s.
hockey20000
Registered User
- Dec 23, 2018
- 4,885
- 2,909
its georgia there attendance wasnt good anyway lol who wants to watch hockey in georgia come on now. if your gonna put a team down in america pick a hockey state.“I told you so”
Ahh yes….. HF is so full of experts on the subject.
Arizona was a last minute desperation move by the league when Gluckstien and Burke couldn’t get an arena deal done in Minnesota.
They lasted 28 years in spite of a revolving door of bad owners (vetted by the league), and bad decision on arena location and 18 years worth of predictions from same HF “experts” they were “100% sure going to be relocating the following year.”
Frankly speaking if I were a betting man for a living m the last place I would look for wagering advice would be HFBoards.
Now….. If Atlanta puts together a bad ownership group full of wannabes then you’re prediction might come true.
That won’t be Atlanta’s fault as a market. Just like it wasn’t Arizona’s.
TheLegend
"Just say it 3 times..."
And I will remind you that Ottawa, for a while, was subject of the same things you’re projecting about Atlanta. And they’re still not out of the woods either.
AtlantaWhaler
Thrash/Preds/Sabres
- Jul 3, 2009
- 20,212
- 3,456
Not sure if you saw, but Carolina, Tampa, Florida, and Dallas were all top-10 in attendance last season (all more than Ottawa by the way). Nashville was 100% sold out.
This renovation to the Toyota Center last year should have made it clear to everyone that Fertitta had something like this in mind.
Tawnos
A guy with a bass
I will forever maintain that if Fertitta had started going after the NHL just a little bit earlier than he did, he would have the Coyotes right now.
Major4Boarding
Unfamiliar Moderator
dj4aces
An Intricate Piece of Infinity
Then it's a good thing franchises aren't awarded based on one fan's perception of merit!
I mean, would it be cool to see a team in Kansas City, Milwaukee, or Portland? Perhaps. But there are questions, the biggest of which is "are there any groups even trying right now, and if so, are any of them far enough along with building rapport with the league to even be considered?"
Pretty sure the answer is "no".
Meanwhile, Atlanta has two known groups who has built rapport with the league, has big money backing and arena plans. It's as simple as that.
Gotta admit, I always had the QC 3.0 franchise penciled in as playing the Atlanta 3.0 franchise in the first round of the playoffs the first time they make it in. But an opening night tilt sounds great too!
ponder719
M-M-M-Matvei and the Jett
Without question. The NHL would absolutely have put them there, because the less time between interest and possession, the less opportunity he has to get cold feet. (On top of which, Houston is absolutely the white whale for the NHL. Atlanta's a huge get if they do it right, but from a business perspective, it's malpractice to have only one team in the second most populous state in the US, when you have 3 in the NYC metro alone.)
Get a NBA/MLB team. There are people in Montreal trying to do both. Bell will need content TSN.
BKIslandersFan
F*** off
TheLegend
"Just say it 3 times..."
The counterpoint to that is.....
Point being made here is...... So what if Fertitta is reinstalling a new ice system?? Sure.... he could be setting himself up to house an NHL team, but he could end up with an AHL, ECHL or even a college team instead....
..... OR booking a lot of Disney On Ice shows.
Makes for great speculation but none of it guarantees anything.
dj4aces
An Intricate Piece of Infinity
Maybe *they'll* be that big money investor PKP has been seeking since 2018?
It's gonna take more to get a Toronto #2 team though, because there's the franchise fee, indemnification (unless there's a deal for market access in that sales contract somewhere), then building a new barn.
Just my two cents though. I'm sure someone will point out where I'm wrong or something.
Yukon Joe
Registered User
Why would Bell sell a 37.5% interest in the most valuable sports franchise in Canada (surprisingly the Raptors) and the second most valuable franchise in Canada (Leafs), plus the 10th most valuable (Toronto FC) - in exchange for a team in Montreal?
Boringly, Bell is probably just going to pay down debt.
TheLegend
"Just say it 3 times..."
There was a hell of a chance he could have got them instead of Meruelo. Barroway wasn't going to make your through the 2018-2019 season.
And he could have got them for much less than he'd have to pay for an expansion now.
Probably will reinvest in their core business but also Ed Rogers was a headache to deal with. It's not out of the realm that they take that money and that's more than enough for a NBA/MLB expansion. The NBA is going to continue to grow so it wouldn't be a worry and you could open up a brand new market.
Isn't he more interested in more teams now that Houston is giving him incentives because they want people to come back to the downtown core to spend money?
hockey20000
Registered User
- Dec 23, 2018
- 4,885
- 2,909
i have full faith in ottawa having 0% chance to move before atlantas 3rd team lol thanks for your concern though
Yukon Joe
Registered User
As I remember it, in the lease between the Rockets and Harris County, Harris County agrees to not help build any competing arena during the life of the lease.
So any bid that doesn't involve the Toyota Center would have to either be 100% privately financed, or would need to be in a neighboring county and supported by that local government.
100% privately financed just never happens these days. There's always some kind of government assistance - either direct grants, tax abatements, development rights, etc.
A neighboring county isn't impossible to imagine - Houston is a BIG metro area. But if you put the arena in, I dunno, The Woodlands, or in Galveston it's going to be nowhere near the center of the population.
Edit: I missed the conclusion - therefore a team in Houston is almost certainly with Fertitia.
Houston is a large city. But, I can't imagine a private builder getting the greenlight to build another 18K arena in Harris county. Because, it's more than just the space for the arena. Going to need parking lots and transit to get people in and out of the area. Really don't need 2 of them. Would have to be like ATL plan in a neighboring county.
Outside of LA/NY, not many other large cities have 2 relatively new arenas. In Fla, Heat and Panthers, I've seen that the Heat's arena gets way more non sporting events than the Panthers, same with the Suns and the Coyotes (in Glendale).
I would agree with GKJ, in that the NHL needs to do their due diligence with TF. You want to make sure you don't end up with another ASG in ATL where the NHL team is an afterthought. Can't afford that in a non traditional market. That the NHL club isn't just a play to get a new arena (though, I don't get why Toyota Center couldn't be renovated since it opened in 2003 to accommodate whatever the new trend is for arenas) and then be discarded later.
Attendance in Atlanta hovered around 83% capacity, for Thrashers games.
This despite:
-Horrible Arena, that was one of the worst venues in the NHL
-Little marketing efforts by Turner or Atlanta Spirit Group (ASG)
-ASG had no interest in the NHL, when they purchased the Hawks, Phillips, and the Thrashers from Turner. They put little budget into the Thrashers
-LOCATION! The arena location was solid for the NBA and terrible for the NHL. The population in the Northern Suburbs are the fans that want to see games. Fans in Forsyth, Gwinnett, and Fulton, has to fight traffic for 2+ hours to attend a game.
Why it will succeed now
-Arena proposed is a state of the art arena in a development that is a work, live, and play community.
-Location, Forsyth County is one of the fastest growing counties in the US. Many people moving into this area are Northern Transplants, and the 400 corridor is loaded with northern transplants who where the bulk of the Thrashers season ticket holders.
-Growth in hockey. Youth Leagues continue to grow, and have done so for 20+ years. The ECHL Team in Gwinnett continues to have solid attendance. UGA's Men's hockey Team continues to see solid attendance.
-Both ownership groups have members that have been in ownership groups for other teams.
