Prospect Info: NHL Draft 2018 - Friday...Friday...

IF something happens, what will it be?


  • Total voters
    55
Status
Not open for further replies.

Bonsai Tree

Turning a new leaf
Feb 2, 2014
9,358
4,771
If we have somebody equally rated to Tkachuk I could seem them leaning away from a legacy player. One tour with Old Walt was enough IMO.
Saw a tweet referencing a quote from Tim Bernhardt where he says (paraphrased), "We're not going to be waiting on pins and needles to see what teams ahead of us are doing" and that "We will be very happy with the player we pick at number 5."

Now, I don't want to read too much into this, but this could be spun as the Coyotes having already made their pick of player who isn't part of the consensus top-5 players (Wahlstrom?).

I love/hate Draft season.
Oh hell I hope not. Let some other team go off the beaten path to find a diamond in the rough.
 

moosemeister

5,000 strong
Feb 15, 2010
9,686
10,979
Mesa, Arizona
I'll get cancer if that happens.

40 GP - 8 Goals

vs

62 GP - 48 Goals

Wahlstrom looks better on his feet. Has a better shot. Clearly put up better numbers. Keller had 21 goals in the same program as Butt Tissue. I don't see anything that BT has that Wahlstrom doesn't besides a mean streak.

And I don't give a shit about the mean streak. We can get that out of Crouse, or Strome if someone calls his mom a bitch. That's attainable anywhere.

I do not feel comfortable AT ALL using a top five pick on Tkachuk.
 

IPreferPi

A Nonny Mouse
Jun 22, 2012
11,456
914
Phoenix, AZ
To be fair to Tkachuk, let's take a look at his stats last season as a 17 year old:

USNTDP - 24 GP, 12 goals, 23 points
U18 Team - 61 GP, 25 goals, 49 points

Better production. But still noticeably lower than what Wahlstrom achieved this season as a 17 year old:

USNTDP - 26 GP, 22 goals, 45 points
U18 Team - 62 GP, 48 goals, 94 points
 
  • Like
Reactions: moosemeister

IPreferPi

A Nonny Mouse
Jun 22, 2012
11,456
914
Phoenix, AZ
The one thing that will give me pause about Chayka selecting Tkachuk is that given his draft picks so far over two years, he does seem to factor in the value of prospect age.

Not counting late-round overagers like Steenbergen and Kudla, Tkachuk would be the oldest prospect Chayka has ever selected at the time of the draft.
 

The Feckless Puck

Registered Loser
Sponsor
Oct 26, 2006
18,751
12,006
I just don't know how Chayka can go with another "projectable" prospect this high up in the Draft after what we've been through with Dylan Strome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigJCaRoach

TheLegend

"Just say it 3 times..."
Aug 30, 2009
38,661
31,782
Buzzing BoH
Saw a tweet referencing a quote from Tim Bernhardt where he says (paraphrased), "We're not going to be waiting on pins and needles to see what teams ahead of us are doing" and that "We will be very happy with the player we pick at number 5."

Now, I don't want to read too much into this, but this could be spun as the Coyotes having already made their pick of player who isn't part of the consensus top-5 players (Wahlstrom?).

I love/hate Draft season.

Referring to this article??

http://arizonasports.com/story/1565...-tim-bernhardt/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
 

avco

Registered User
Feb 10, 2007
329
50
Found it funny that Bob McKenzie's Scouting Report on Wahlstrom is

"He’s an elite shooter and goal scorer. Some say he’s somewhat one dimensional - “he needs a good centre to get him the puck because he’s not good at getting it himself,” one scout said - but what a dimension to have because scouts project him as a potential first-line scoring winger in the NHL." - Bob McKenzie

Reason I found this description funny; Mike Bossy in his draft year was said to be one dimensional; which was why the Islanders got him on the 15th OV pick in 1977. Also know how Bossy turned out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AZviaNJ

IPreferPi

A Nonny Mouse
Jun 22, 2012
11,456
914
Phoenix, AZ

The TL;DR summary:

“You can’t look for specific holes to fill,” he said. “We’re like 30 other teams. Center ice is a hard position to fill and get depth in. Defense is probably the second hardest and then goaltending and wingers, but it’s hard enough to find players when you’re looking at 17-year-olds so we can’t get too specific.

“Our approach is: Let’s get good players and it will be up to John to move those pieces around, like he just did in the trade for Alex Galchenyuk. You have a lot of left wingers so you trade one for a guy who plays center and right wing. If we get enough good players we’ll be a good team because it will give John the ammunition and assets to move around. You don’t build a team with the draft. You build an organization with the draft and then you build a team by using those pieces.”
 

XX

Waiting for Ishbia
Dec 10, 2002
54,965
14,757
PHX
Reason I found this description funny; Mike Bossy in his draft year was said to be one dimensional; which was why the Islanders got him on the 15th OV pick in 1977. Also know how Bossy turned out.

I find your anecdote funny because that has probably been said about dozens if not hundreds of players and it turned out to be absolutely true. We don't remember them because they amounted to nothing. You can't let one player anchor your view like that.

It's clear Matthew's impact (and to a lesser extent Tom Wilson) is helping Brady stay high in the rankings. Chayka hasn't really blown a 1st rounder yet so I defer to him and the staff.
 

IPreferPi

A Nonny Mouse
Jun 22, 2012
11,456
914
Phoenix, AZ
I find your anecdote funny because that has probably been said about dozens if not hundreds of players and it turned out to be absolutely true. We don't remember them because they amounted to nothing. You can't let one player anchor your view like that.

It's clear Matthew's impact (and to a lesser extent Tom Wilson) is helping Brady stay high in the rankings. Chayka hasn't really blown a 1st rounder yet so I defer to him and the staff.

It's funny because in your first paragraph you're decrying anchoring Wahlstrom to Bossy and then in the second you acknowledge Brady's value is being inflated because of anchoring to his brother.

Chayka hasn't really blown a first rounder yet and of course I give him and the scouts the benefit of the doubt because they deserve it. But that also doesn't mean that their decisions are above reproach or that they'll continue batting 1.000.
 

XX

Waiting for Ishbia
Dec 10, 2002
54,965
14,757
PHX
It's funny because in your first paragraph you're decrying anchoring Wahlstrom to Bossy and then in the second you acknowledge Brady's value is being inflated because of anchoring to his brother.

Trends come and go. I'm not saying it's a positive thing at all, and it's certainly not if the Coyotes "fall for it" and fail to make an objective assessment. I haven't really seen this staff do that yet so I'll wait until the pick is actually in before getting upset.
 

cobra427

Registered User
May 6, 2012
9,383
3,421
Brady is over rated because of his name and his brothers play last year but Chayka won't fall for it. I see us taking Zadina/Hughes/Wahlstrom in that order based on who is available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moosemeister

AZviaNJ

“Sure as shit want to F*** Coyote fans.”
Mar 31, 2011
6,745
4,464
AZ
Brady is over rated because of his name and his brothers play last year but Chayka won't fall for it. I see us taking Zadina/Hughes/Wahlstrom in that order based on who is available.
I'll be happy with whomever the Coyotes pick...…...I'll be happier if it's Zadina, Hughes or Wahlstrom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigDoaner

The Feckless Puck

Registered Loser
Sponsor
Oct 26, 2006
18,751
12,006
Are you referring to Tkachuk? They're kind of opposite. Strome was as productive as they get. He was just slow and unathletic. Brady has the inverse issues.

Sure, they're opposite style players - but the whole "projectable" thing, they share. They're tools-heavy players, and people extrapolate their futures from their tools rather than from their results.
 

rt

Clean Hits on Substack
Sure, they're opposite style players - but the whole "projectable" thing, they share. They're tools-heavy players, and people extrapolate their futures from their tools rather than from their results.
I disagree. Strome's results were historically strong. He was tall but weak and slow. It was the production that drove everyone wild about him. His production was as good as most first overall picks. I'm not talking about being stylistically opposite.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad