Toggle sidebar

NHL: Around the League 53

Hawkaholic

Hawkaholic

Registered User
Dec 19, 2006
32,430
12,094
London, Ont.
GIADF said:
I agree 100%. We probably aren’t a consideration if he has a say in his destination. I can’t remember his NTC/NMC situation off memory but think he has some say.

But in the crazy hypothetical he would consider us, that’s as good of a package as I’d like to see them offer.
Click to expand...
I'd offer a little more than that if needed, but not much more.
 
Blackhawkswincup

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
191,003
23,701
Chicagoland
I would target Pinto actually in Ottawa

He is having awful season and seems like guy Sens could look to move to shake things up

Bedard
Nazar
Pinto

Would be nice down middle for rest of this year (Whenever Nazar gets his call) and next year IMO

Doubt Pinto costs as much as he would have cost last year during contract impasse, so a good potential buy low/high reward player
 
BHawk21

BHawk21

Registered User
Mar 21, 2022
2,448
1,550
Hawkaholic said:
Making what a big deal? He made an argument, I asked him to prove his argument lol. Wtf are you talking about?
Click to expand...
Any stat I point to, any argument made you will say its cherry picked or what about this or that. You will discredit think your right in your own head and we will go round and round.

You did this with Necas. You can go ahead thinking Pionk is better then Jones.
 
Hawkaholic

Hawkaholic

Registered User
Dec 19, 2006
32,430
12,094
London, Ont.
BHawk21 said:
Any stat I point to, any argument made you will say its cherry picked or what about this or that. You will discredit think your right in your own head and we will go round and round.

You did this with Necas. You can go ahead thinking Pionk is better then Jones.
Click to expand...
Sure. The thing is, you can't point to any stat.

You make a statement, be sure to back it up. But you can't, so that's why you aren't doing it.
 
Last edited:
crazyhawk

crazyhawk

Registered User
Apr 8, 2011
2,962
1,383
In the Hills
Brady Tkachuk for Korchinski and a late 1st?! He's their captain, point leader ( well almost - 2 behind Stutzle ), elite power forward and shit disturber. I would think they would want a fair bit more but hey if we could get him for that I say yes sir. Pinto as already mentioned would be a good catch and cost a whole lot less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muffinalt
Giovi

Giovi

Registered User
Sponsor
Feb 1, 2009
2,704
4,007
crazyhawk said:
Brady Tkachuk for Korchinski and a late 1st?! He's their captain, point leader ( well almost - 2 behind Stutzle ), elite power forward and shit disturber. I would think they would want a fair bit more but hey if we could get him for that I say yes sir. Pinto as already mentioned would be a good catch and cost a whole lot less.
Click to expand...
Why would Tkachuk come to Chicago? And even if he accepted a trade to the Hawks, his contract supposedly has a clause in it making him captain. If that clause follows Tkachuk to Chicago, it sends a pretty bad message to the young players about what it takes to become a team leader.

"According to what Radio-Canada journalist Martin Leclerc reveals in the latest edition of the «Tellement hockey»podcast, it would seem that the explanation behind this nomination is quite different and that it would not go over very well with his teammates.

"I don't know if Claude Giroux will be able to help this, but it seems that there is a problem with the leadership of the Senators. Brady Tkachuk became captain because he had that clause in his contract and it doesn't seem to have gone over very well with his teammates." - Martin Leclerc, Via GoHabsGo.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X