These guys aren't superstars that they can make something out of an impossible situation.
Luckily no-one is asking them too...
These guys aren't superstars that they can make something out of an impossible situation.
Actually, history proves that the vast majority of the time, it doesn’t work. For every ****tsburg, you have Arizona, Carolina, the Piles etc...
Yeah, TWICE, in the last fifteen years!Yeah but sometimes it DOES work.
You know what never works? Trying to "go for it" when you're in a hopeless situation. Thats what the dark ages were.
Almost every single current cup contender went through a time of sucking to be where they currently are.Actually, history proves that the vast majority of the time, it doesn’t work. For every ****tsburg, you have Arizona, Carolina, the Piles etc...
Anyone have a link for hanks interview?
Yeah, TWICE, in the last fifteen years!
...and “Going for it” is not a hopeless situation. Making the playoffs is a prudent business model and has helped catapult this franchise to the most valuable in the sport.
Yeah, TWICE, in the last fifteen years!
...and “Going for it” is not a hopeless situation. Making the playoffs is a prudent business model and has helped catapult this franchise to the most valuable in the sport.
This has been his worst stretch as a Ranger probably. I'm still a Fast guy. I think you need guys like that in your bottom 6 and his cap hit is reasonable.And the Jesper Fast hype lately? This guy has been TERRIBLE since he came back from injury absolutely TERRIBLE.
The only guy worse? Mats Zuccarello. Please trade this kid this week cannot be brought back. He’s dogged it ever since he was given that A.
Twice?
While I wouldn't consider LA a "tank" team, they did have several top 10 selections (Hickey, which they ****ed up, Doughty, which they didn't and Schenn, who they moved for Richards.)
Seeing as how those 2 teams (and LA) are responsible for every single cup except 1 since 2009 doesn't exactly help your argument.
Boston is the lone team who was able to win something with out hanging at the bottom of the Standings. **** even the Hurricanes picked in the top 5 3 years in a row prior to 2006.
Are you serious? Guys had what one or two bad games.. see the rest of this roster he does what hes suppose to do for a bottom six guy what do you want him scoring 40 points a season. thats not what he is here for and hes one of our best PK guys...And the Jesper Fast hype lately? This guy has been TERRIBLE since he came back from injury absolutely TERRIBLE.
The only guy worse? Mats Zuccarello. Please trade this kid this week cannot be brought back. He’s dogged it ever since he was given that A.
The irony of AV blaming his goalies is almost too much to handle.**** AV. you don't just get to blame your goalies every ****ing team you go to you pos
It has worked more than twiceYeah, TWICE, in the last fifteen years!
...and “Going for it” is not a hopeless situation. Making the playoffs is a prudent business model and has helped catapult this franchise to the most valuable in the sport.
Far too many. That’s why people should pump the breaks when wanting to bottom out.And how many teams were uncompetitive for years after tanking and won nothing?
And how many teams were uncompetitive for years after tanking and won nothing?
Indeed I am, but beyond that, I am a fan above all else and have been since the age of five. I will NEVER root for a loss!Unless you are a shareholder the bolded seems an odd thing to be focused on/proud of
A bunch. I'm not arguing that its a bullet proof plan. But it has a MUCH higher rate of success than to keep going for it when you're where the Rangers are right now (where the success rate is 0%)
Lets not try to compare the Rangers to the Panthers or Coyotes though. Being a big market team, they're going to always be a hot spot for UFA's. As long as they don't **** up their draft picks, it won't take too long for them to be competitive again.
Twice, Shittsburg and Chicago.Twice?
While I wouldn't consider LA a "tank" team, they did have several top 10 selections (Hickey, which they ****ed up, Doughty, which they didn't and Schenn, who they moved for Richards.)
Seeing as how those 2 teams (and LA) are responsible for every single cup except 1 since 2009 doesn't exactly help your argument.
Boston is the lone team who was able to win something with out hanging at the bottom of the Standings. **** even the Hurricanes picked in the top 5 3 years in a row prior to 2006.
Edmonton tanked for like 19 straight decades and was in the playoffs 2x.And how many teams were uncompetitive for years after tanking and won nothing?
Your argument is if you don’t win the Stanley cup you are mediocre and should tank!It has worked more than twice
Pittsburgh: Malkin 2nd, Crosby 1st
Washington: Ovi 1st, Backstrom 4th
Tampa: Stamkos 1st, Hedman 2nd
LA: Kopitar 11th, Doughty 2nd
Jets: Scheifele 7th, Ehlers 9th, Laine 2nd
Leafs: Reily 5th, Nylander 8th, Marner 4th, Matthews 1st
Predators: Forsberg was acquired in a deal where they were a selling team, Jones 4th (traded him for one of their best players)
Chicago: Toews 3rd, Kane 1st
There's more to building a team but sucking and getting good players is at the foundation of it
But the Bruins did bottom out from 2006-2007 after trading Thorton and in 2006 is when the Bruins choose Kessel Bergeron (Meant Lucic my bad) and Marchand with two of those guys becoming foundations in their cup runsSince the lockout, the Wings, Ducks, and Bruins won without bottoming out. The Bruins did have Seguin but he was a rookie. The Rangers and Sharks could have easily won with a couple of bounces. Neither team bottomed out.
Were much worse than Mediocre we showed that todayYour argument is if you don’t win the Stanley cup you are mediocre and should tank!