GDT: New York at Boston Pt. II

  • Thread starter Thread starter *Bob Richards*
  • Start date Start date
  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I love this place, but can't stand the amount of non-hockey playing posters who have no clue about the game/individual players. ie. getting on Lundqvist.

Rough man.

99% it seems have never played a game of hockey. They think the puck moves in slow motion. "Well if he's on the left and the puck goes right why didnt he just move right and make the save"....
 
last 20 we must shot more, and no..not into Rask's chest - I noticed he usualy "jumps" when we shot at him so if we shot along the ice we might score..

then we must screen Rask more...Get big guys in front of him...like Kreider..or put zuke in front of him to confuse him...
 
The Bruins play a championship level game. When a team's 4th line outplays your ****ing 1st line, you don't deserve to win a game! It's not all about Hank here.

I can't take this anymore. People would rather **** on all of the skaters that DOMINATED the Bruins in the 2nd period than say a negative thing about Hank. STOP!!!! Just because he's great doesn't mean he's above criticism and you have to grasp at straws and **** on the team that has dominated the ****ing game to make him look good. It's ridiculous. :rant:
 
Brassard has been lazy on the backcheck. Looks tired out there at times.
 
Watch the replay..Watch the shooter pick his spot. Even if Lundy can see around on the left, the puck is moving too fast. When he sees... the shot is out and in.

meh....he could've stopped the last goal. You don't have to necessarily see the puck 100% of the time to stop it. Sometimes when there's traffic, you have to use your hockey IQ to follow the play, know what's developing and anticipate the play/shot.

I have played in net a bit and often when you can't see (I'm 5-7, so I have a lot of experience in not seeing in net), you take your queues from the way the players flow in front of you. Players often act "like water," in a manner of speaking. They tend to flow towards the puck, and following the movement and reactions of the guys in front can tell you when and where the puck is being passed, and where the shot is coming from without actually seeing the shot.
 
99% it seems have never played a game of hockey. They think the puck moves in slow motion. "Well if he's on the left and the puck goes right why didnt he just move right and make the save"....

Haha yup. Just have to laugh it off man. We know where the real problems are with this team.
 
all i can say is that it has been a pretty even game. i think the rangers have been a bit better but the bruins have gotten a few better bounces and have the lead. this isnt over, though. of course. i have a good feeling.
 
Yes. I made mention of this on the main board. That's besides the point. Usually the Rangers also play a tighter style, plus his amazing games counterbalance the garbage he puts up. He's just madly inconsistent.

Well his stdev goals/game in the playoffs (for career) is 1.50 and in the regular season (over past 3 years) is 1.23 so you may be right. Playoff sample might be slightly thrown off though by my including his rookie season where he gave up 6,4,3 in 3 games and the overall sample is much less than the regular season (and i already closed excel and don't have time to redo without them in now)
 
Am I really starting to understand that this forum thinks that HANK is the reason why we barely got out of the first round and lost last night?


Not our SUPREME lack of power play, lack of first period goals, lack of any want to play in the first period, lack of ability to clear the puck out of our zone, lack of Richards or Nash not to be invisible. etc etc etc.

Nope. Its HANK.

Yall Pejorative Slured.
 
The Rangers' defense has been BAD in the 48 games, outside of the first 3 games of the season that can be attributed to the lockout when did he allow 3 goals in 5 out of 9 games this season? Please answer this Lundqvist apologists. He's playing WELL below his standards. Stop being Lundqvist apologists because he plays well in the regular season and steals a couple of games in the playoffs, consistency is key in the playoffs. This is abso-****ing-lutely unacceptable on his part.
 
99% it seems have never played a game of hockey. They think the puck moves in slow motion. "Well if he's on the left and the puck goes right why didnt he just move right and make the save"....

The only ones I question are the ones that can never blame the goalie for missing a puck. Like you and nevesis. Hank has had a very, very poor game for an elite goaltender. He's not even playing average -- far below it. Even on the saves he is making he looks shaky. This is a bad game by him. Some of you guys need to wake up and realize that. Hank should not be immune from criticism.
 
meh....he could've stopped the last goal. You don't have to necessarily see the puck 100% of the time to stop it. Sometimes when there's traffic, you have to use your hockey IQ to follow the play, know what's developing and anticipate the play/shot.

I have played in net a bit and often when you can't see (I'm 5-7, so I have a lot of experience in not seeing in net), you take your queues from the way the players flow in front of you. Players often act "like water," in a manner of speaking. They tend to flow towards the puck, and following the movement and reactions of the guys in front can tell you when and where the puck is being passed, and where the shot is coming from without actually seeing the shot.

Your not gonna anticipate top corner. Plus it wasnt like the guy was rushed. he got the puck setup and picked a spot. So really its the opposite in this case. The shooter was the one following the keeper and knew he wasnt gonna be anywhere near top corner. Watch the replay and see how Lundy reacts even after the puck went in. Its almost like he is saying. "It went in?"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad