Sorinth
Registered User
- Jan 18, 2013
- 11,595
- 6,240
Perhaps you're right. Perhaps it's impossible in today's NHL to ruin a team so permanently as Houle did. But why take chances? Why we just don't implement a thorough hiring process? I mean, we're trashing every micro-decision of our every GM, but when the time comes to hire a replacement, we're so relieved that the old guy is gone that we become shockingly cavalier about choosing his successor. How many decades are we willing to just throw the **** at the wall?
We absolutely should do a better job hiring people. But the fear that things might be worse is no reason to leave someone incompetent in charge.
Honestly I think Bergevin has destroyed the team he inherited just as badly as Houle did, the only difference was Houle had a mandate to cut costs, whereas Bergevin actually thought he was making the team better.