NCAA to allow CHL players to play hockey?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
About that...



I'm very surprised that Penticton is potentially making the jump. I guess the threat of the BCHL finally going kaput after the CHL/NCAA agreement, and disagreements with Kelowna over territory rights is an easy hurdle compared to being out in the wilderness.


I heard a month ago that Penticton was going to be granted an expansion team but that Chilliwack was denied (reasons never given or explained). Will be interested to see if both are actually granted franchises.
 
So is this going to take Penticton out of the BCHL?
Sounds like it’s the Vees who are moving so yeah, I imagine the BCHL team is done.

Still lots of open questions about Junior A in BC. BC Hockey has promised to make a decision about which Junior B teams they elevated to Junior A would be considered Tier 1. With the NCAA decision and assuming this move by Chilliwack and Penticton comes to pass, is there a path back to Hockey Canada sanctions for the remaining BCHL teams? Will there be BCHL teams that go back on their own, as Merritt did last year? Bottom line is lots of balls in the air that will need to come down. Interesting times.
 
Sounds like it’s the Vees who are moving so yeah, I imagine the BCHL team is done.

Still lots of open questions about Junior A in BC. BC Hockey has promised to make a decision about which Junior B teams they elevated to Junior A would be considered Tier 1. With the NCAA decision and assuming this move by Chilliwack and Penticton comes to pass, is there a path back to Hockey Canada sanctions for the remaining BCHL teams? Will there be BCHL teams that go back on their own, as Merritt did last year? Bottom line is lots of balls in the air that will need to come down. Interesting times.
What exactly are their options? Either go up or down?
 
Another potential wrinkle:



1740259881219.png


Considering the NCAA-CHL agreement, and stream of overage CHL players filling out rosters for D1 hockey teams in the US, with almost 90% of those players being Canadian, alongside the amount of work D1 programs do in recruiting foreign players (not even Canadian, but now increasingly Scandinavian and Eastern European) if this gets enough steam to be tabled in federal courts, how much does that grenade all that has been done so far? It essentially forces D1 hockey, the CHL, and the NCAA back to square one.
 
Another potential wrinkle:



View attachment 980900

Considering the NCAA-CHL agreement, and stream of overage CHL players filling out rosters for D1 hockey teams in the US, with almost 90% of those players being Canadian, alongside the amount of work D1 programs do in recruiting foreign players (not even Canadian, but now increasingly Scandinavian and Eastern European) if this gets enough steam to be tabled in federal courts, how much does that grenade all that has been done so far? It essentially forces D1 hockey, the CHL, and the NCAA back to square one.



Coincidental? Maybe.
 


Coincidental? Maybe.

The issue is...the NHL is already subsidizing a large swath, if not all, of the teams within the CHL. Maybe a handful in each league are regularly profitable year over year, and most are in the red more often then not. How much more growth and expansion could each league have, especially considering the foibles of small city arena deals and business, and also knowing the Q is adamant behind closed doors that they will not expand into Maine/Vermont/upstate NY?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad