ClydeLee
Registered User
- Mar 23, 2012
- 12,155
- 5,649
Then ya know they could of kept him?Are you implying that Montreal gave up on Kotkaniemi? They actually had him penciled in for 2c until Carolina publicly pantsed Marc Bergevin.
Then ya know they could of kept him?Are you implying that Montreal gave up on Kotkaniemi? They actually had him penciled in for 2c until Carolina publicly pantsed Marc Bergevin.
Not at that price no. It was a no brainer to let him walk. Unless you'd like Kotkaniemi at 4.82 million per year for the next 8 years on your team?Then ya know they could of kept him?
Well, they did give up on Kotkaniemi, they would have matched otherwise. I'm not implying that they should have matched, sometimes a change of scenery is needed and it makes more sense to cut your losses.Are you implying that Montreal gave up on Kotkaniemi? They actually had him penciled in for 2c until Carolina publicly pantsed Marc Bergevin.
great value for the habs. He ain't close to doneDach was great till he hurt his wrist playing for the juniors. Could it be that it still isn't right, or was he simply brought down by the mess that is Chicago?
great value for the habs. He ain't close to doneDach was great till he hurt his wrist playing for the juniors. Could it be that it still isn't right, or was he simply brought down by the mess that is Chicago?
Dachs potential is way higher. This is nuts. He had one bad year coming off an injury.We had a lengthy discussion a couple days ago on HF Jackets about trading pick #12 for Dach. Nazar was the player most were focused on drafting there, and the more popular opinion was that Nazar > Dach. And I fully agree with that.
I mean currently, yes Dach is a more solid bet. He is in the NHL. But Nazar's upside is a lot higher. Dach doesn't have the sense to be a top scoring forward.
thats fine and dandy but simply being big isnt enough either. You need a lot going right for successful playoff hockey. Also Kucherov and Point are both listed under 6'0" and were the best 2 forwards on the ice for 2 championship runs. When it comes to high end skill like I believe Nazar has, draft that and surround them with size like Tampa did.It's hilarious to me how size is being dismissed more and more when we see every year in the playoffs how important it is...not saying you can't have smaller players but they better be impact players otherwise there's nowhere else to put them
The only real way to assess the trade is to view it as Romanov for Dach.
I don't think the Habs need another smurf. Dach will do more for them in the long run.The Habs needed a center and could have kept the 13oa pick acquired by trading Romanov, and with that Nazar if they had waited, instead of trading for Dach.
Which of these players looks to have more potential in the long run?
Didn't you know, now that Dach is a hab he's the worst player that exists.
According to HF now.. Dach=a bag of pucks!! mmm maybe 2..
but the Habs couldve just kept 13th overall (even if that wasnt their intention), as it wasnt a 3-way trade. The Habs made 2 trades.its not Dach vs Nazar, its Dach vs Romanov.
The habs wouldn't have traded for the 13th pick if not for the Hawks wanting a top 15 pick for Dach.
Not a chance.This place hates the Hawks way more than the Habs
but the Habs couldve just kept 13th overall (even if that wasnt their intention), as it wasnt a 3-way trade. The Habs made 2 trades.
In the end, the Habs chose Dach over 13th OA, and the Hawks chose 13th OA (Nazar) over Dach.
He is doing okay. Coming back from a major injury (missed the whole season). It does not help that Laine got injure. So the Habs has only one good line.Hows Dach playing? Nazar will probably be in the AHL until the trade deadline. Looked bad in preseason but very good in the AHL.