I'd actually like to see the QoC metrics because often times, Draisaitl is out against the other team's top scoring line whereas McDavid's line faces the other team's shutdown lines.
That's actually an interesting point I haven't really considered (although I'm not really a stats guy.) How do those QoC metrics evaluate shutdown lines vs scoring lines?
I'm not sure which I'd rather face for a benefit statistically. Shutdown lines basically just try to tread water and slow the bleeding--if you are facing a shutdown line, it is almost by design that you either outscore them or come out even. Top lines might be easier to score against, but you might never have the puck, and both sides are more likely to score. Its a generalization, but it's kind of choosing between performing in a low event or high event environment, which are actually pretty different. Success in one may not mean success in the other.
One player stylistically might be better tailored to success against shutdown lines, while the other better against offensive players, i.e. speed, rush offense, elite skating vs possession, puck protection, board battles. That story wouldn't really get measured in the statistics, and success might have some (or more than some) dependance on stylistic matchup.
Do QoC stats skew in favour of either role?