token grinder
Facts Get Deleted
If Stamkos is cool with three years, open the checkbook. Him and ROR would come off at the same time then.
Honestly might be good to have em staggered. Stamkos can move to wing if pushed out by a young CIf Stamkos is cool with three years, open the checkbook. Him and ROR would come off at the same time then.
The problem is everyone thinks they can do better than Trotz because they won the Stanley Cup for 6 straight seasons on Be A GM mode. All you have to do is trade Saros and a 2nd for Connor Bedard and let Askarov become a 90 overall after 2 seasonsReading these threads, it does seem like the GMBT honeymoon period may be over.
I would put novak on wing with Pärssinen down the middle. Give L'Heureux one more season in the AHL and Tomasino a legit shot to at the very least build some trade value. We just saw Holtz go for next to nothing. Trading Tomasino for next to nothing when he has some real offensive flair would be silly.Nyquist-ROR-Forsberg
Stamkos-Stephenson-Evangelista
Pärssinen-Novak-L'Heureux
Smith-McCarron-Sissons
Skjei-Josi
Gustafsson-Walker
Lauzon-Fabbro
Schenn
Saros
Askarov
That would be a true contending team. Cap space currently 26mil If u think the contracts would be like:
Stammer 6mil for 3 years
Stephenson 5mil for 4 years
Skjei 6mil for 5 years
Walker for 3mil
Gustafsson for 2mil
That's 22mil, i think you want to add a little bit more scoring from the D line so that's why i thought of Gustafsson. The main priority should be Stammer, Skjei and Stephenson, that would really be a great top 6. Come on Barry make it happen !
You can even move guys like Tomasino and Svechkov, because there isn't really space for them. I think Kemell should be kept for the future.
He didn’t commit. This past year was the year. Instead we picked 22.Mushy middle it is then I guess. Hopefully Trotz can actually decide on a strategy one of these days because the tactics do not seem to be in alignment with previous statements.
Or, people can have different opinions and that's what boards like this are for. There's some whining, but I see plenty of decent discussion here, and it ain't from posts like this just vomiting out strawmen and appeals to authority.The problem is everyone thinks they can do better than Trotz because they won the Stanley Cup for 6 straight seasons on Be A GM mode. All you have to do is trade Saros and a 2nd for Connor Bedard and let Askarov become a 90 overall after 2 seasons
I love a healthy discussion, however I see more whining about the teams moves rather than offering realistic ideas and solutions (and im pretty sure a few are just the same people with burner accounts). They place unrealistic expectations on management and get butt hurt when they make a move to stay competitiveOr, people can have different opinions and that's what boards like this are for. There's some whining, but I see plenty of decent discussion here, and it ain't from posts like this just vomiting out strawmen and appeals to authority.
I think there are like 2, maybe 3, posters that put out ridiculous trade proposals you'd see in a video game. I think most that are expressing discontent don't see a cohesive plan that matches what has been articulated by the front office. Things still need to play out, so reactions are a little premature, but it doesn't generally come from a place that is posters thinking it's simple and they could do better.Or, people can have different opinions and that's what boards like this are for. There's some whining, but I see plenty of decent discussion here, and it ain't from posts like this just vomiting out strawmen and appeals to authority.
Unless it's someone I have on ignore ( which is like 3 -4 people) I don't think anyone else fits that criteria. Several of the posters go back to the old Preds board ( and as far as I know I only have one of those on ignore ).I love a healthy discussion, however I see more whining about the teams moves rather than offering realistic ideas and solutions (and im pretty sure a few are just the same people with burner accounts). They place unrealistic expectations on management and get butt hurt when they make a move to stay competitive
I’d do 4 years at 7.25The only reason not to go for Stamkos at this point is if he wants term, like more than 3ish years.. clearly a rebuild isn't gonna happen so just use the cap space and there's not really a better option out there
I’d rather go after monahan than stephenson. I but that’s just meNyquist-ROR-Forsberg
Stamkos-Stephenson-Evangelista
Pärssinen-Novak-L'Heureux
Smith-McCarron-Sissons
Skjei-Josi
Gustafsson-Walker
Lauzon-Fabbro
Schenn
Saros
Askarov
That would be a true contending team. Cap space currently 26mil If u think the contracts would be like:
Stammer 6mil for 3 years
Stephenson 5mil for 4 years
Skjei 6mil for 5 years
Walker for 3mil
Gustafsson for 2mil
That's 22mil, i think you want to add a little bit more scoring from the D line so that's why i thought of Gustafsson. The main priority should be Stammer, Skjei and Stephenson, that would really be a great top 6. Come on Barry make it happen !
You can even move guys like Tomasino and Svechkov, because there isn't really space for them. I think Kemell should be kept for the future.
Yeah I've had to just mute as well. I've been lurking and reading long enough to know that sometimes it's just not worth it. Ultimately, we're all here because 1. We love hockey, and 2. We want to see this team winUnless it's someone I have on ignore ( which is like 3 -4 people) I don't think anyone else fits that criteria. Several of the posters go back to the old Preds board ( and as far as I know I only have one of those on ignore ).
Monahan's health still worries me and his defensive game is pretty much none.I’d do 4 years at 7.25
I’d rather go after monahan than stephenson. I but that’s just me
Well I don’t want him for his defensive game I want him for in goal scoring ability which it looks like has came back after his injuriesMonahan's health still worries me and his defensive game is pretty much none.
His defensive ability likely puts him in the doghouse. If Brunette plays him, i think he would do well. Question is... does he get played?The more I think about it, the more I don’t wanna trade askarov. But he needs to be backing up saros this year. I would do a 57/25 split this year and next year I would give him a 3 year bridge contract for 2.5-3 million and I would start giving him a 50/32 game split for 3 years and run a saros/askarov tandem for 4 years. After that who knows. Askarov value might be where Schneider‘s was and we can get a top 10 pick plus something for him. I just don’t see people over paying for him now
Well I don’t want him for his defensive game I want him for in goal scoring ability which it looks like has came back after his injuries
Only reason I think he might is that McDonagh might have put in a good word. Past that the main reason is I think Trotz will probably offer him more money and term than some of the more competitive teams can afford to give.Will be shocked if Stamkos comes here. There are more competitive destinations and agents/GMs have used us as a decoy to get improved offers for so many years now.
They can't but him out as long as he is claiming LTIR status is my understanding.Any word on Johanssen buyout?
I assume and hope, assuming Asky isn't traded, we bring in a veteran backup goalie as well. My approach would then be:The more I think about it, the more I don’t wanna trade askarov. But he needs to be backing up saros this year. I would do a 57/25 split this year and next year I would give him a 3 year bridge contract for 2.5-3 million and I would start giving him a 50/32 game split for 3 years and run a saros/askarov tandem for 4 years. After that who knows. Askarov value might be where Schneider‘s was and we can get a top 10 pick plus something for him. I just don’t see people over paying for him now
Ah!They can't but him out as long as he is claiming LTIR status is my understanding.