Nashville Predators Talk - 2024/2025 Season

Porter Stoutheart

Seen Stamkos?
Jun 14, 2017
16,001
12,422
Stamkos, Forsberg, Josi, and Saros are the only ones with NMCs according to Puckpedia...
not ideal but if it came to it i bet some of those guys would agree to waive.
Marchessault and Skjei also have NMCs according to PuckPedia. Just if they waive theirs, then there is a broader field of possible trade destinations due to their NTCs. But they have full control over being traded or not.

And with Saros, his doesn't kick in until July 1st, 2025. So we could still trade him before then. Which IMHO if the suckage continues we very much should. If anybody will give us anything for him, anyway. He's playing well. Hopefully some team out there would be desperate enough. But I don't really expect that. I don't really believe any other team would touch that contract, not even if he was available for free. At which point, we might just as well keep him. In that sense, what Trotz said is accurate enough - Saros can't practically be moved even if we wanted to, even before his NMC kicks in. :(
 

Nevins

Registered User
Jul 12, 2014
2,659
2,174
It is genuinely depressing that we are the oldest team in the league and this season is probably the best we will be for the next three years.
The most amazing thing about evaluating the Predators' performance is that Saros (I've only seen a few games) seems to be one of their best players. Imagine with an average or bad goalkeeper?
 

Hins77

Registered User
Apr 2, 2013
4,049
3,709
I don’t want to be a hater but signing player around 33/34 years old is like signing players 37/38 yo like 15 years ago. They are beginning their decline big time. I never understood why Trotz put all that money on those UFA. It remember me when Gainey in Montreal were signing old timer a la Robert Lang, Brian Smolinsky, Radek Bonk and cie.
 

Armourboy

Hey! You suck!
Jan 20, 2014
20,568
12,222
Shelbyville, TN
I don’t want to be a hater but signing player around 33/34 years old is like signing players 37/38 yo like 15 years ago. They are beginning their decline big time. I never understood why Trotz put all that money on those UFA. It remember me when Gainey in Montreal were signing old timer a la Robert Lang, Brian Smolinsky, Radek Bonk and cie.
Cause the team wasn't going anywhere over the next couple of years. We had too many good players on NMC's and younger talent to ever bottom out, but not enough to be more than an edge bubble team. So he spent his cap for the next 3-4 years to try and do something more than that.

The good thing about it is that is all he did, use cap space. He didn't trade anything away to get those players, and still has multiple first round picks. We may not be good, but we aren't in a situation like say Pittsburgh and Edmonton where they are old and have nothing younger coming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wmupreds

herzausstein

Registered User
Aug 31, 2014
7,799
5,612
West Virginia
We have to figure out the 2C situation.

Sissons is not a 2C. He can be elevated if an injury occurs but he should not be your gameplan. He is an excellent 4C or a good 3C.

I like what i see out of Tomasino Parssinen Evangelista. Too bad i doubt that ends up sticking when Jankowski and/or Novak get healed.

If we arent going to use Novak as 2C, then i dont really get his place on this team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hockey diva

Predsanddead24

Registered User
Mar 7, 2019
5,917
6,581
What about Nelson on an expiring deal at 2C?
He'd be good but similar to when we discussed trading for Andersson I just don't think we should spend any assets adding to this team until they prove they are even remotely competitive. This team certainly has holes but we should not be in the cellar with teams that are actively tanking and until they can prove they are even a bubble team I'm not adding anything.
 

Flgatorguy87

Registered User
Jul 7, 2011
6,025
3,993
East Nasty
He'd be good but similar to when we discussed trading for Andersson I just don't think we should spend any assets adding to this team until they prove they are even remotely competitive. This team certainly has holes but we should not be in the cellar with teams that are actively tanking and until they can prove they are even a bubble team I'm not adding anything.
I agree. caveat is certainly that the team gets off their face and seems like they are ready to fight a little.
 

Kat Predator

Registered User
Nov 28, 2019
4,228
4,348
Maybe he should tell his coach to give the current younger players a legitimate chance to play....

Agreed. It doesn't make a lot of sense to keep rolling out the same groups of oldsters who can't get anything going over and over and over when plan B, which will come in a couple seasons regardless, is to start wholesale integration of younger players into the lineup.

Sadly the guys that "are here" are also the guys not doing much of anything. They can still be "here" and collect the in-house retirement checks from Trotz while getting 6 minutes of ice time and getting a head start on seeing which younger players are hungry and can play in the NHL.

I think a lot of other fans would be happier seeing some young players be allowed to play through mistakes instead of seeing unwatchable hockey performed by a core that seems to be poorly constructed.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad