Edit: signing is official.Any truth to Wood joining the team for the stretch??
Last edited:
Edit: signing is official.Any truth to Wood joining the team for the stretch??
Sounds like he will meet up with the team. Unsure if he will get any games but he is now signedAny truth to Wood joining the team for the stretch??
Any truth to Wood joining the team for the stretch??
Lord knows there would be room for him with our current situation, lol.I wonder if Molendyk joins as well at the end of his season
Our season likely ends before his does.I wonder if Molendyk joins as well at the end of his season
Bad puck luck for 73 games???? Not buying it. If it was a 15-20 game stretch I might agree with you. If something is this consistent for an entire season it has nothing to do with luck and everything to do with systemic problems.The thing is, the team has had bad puck luck. I know some of y'all don't like "advanced" stats but the team's PDO for example is not just low but extraordinarily low, lowest in the league and one of the lowest in recent years. This is mostly because the team is shooting under 7% which is also probably an unsustainably low number. I'm not saying it's all puck luck, shooting ability is a real thing too, but NHL teams simply don't historically shoot those low %s consistently.
Anyway, that is to say that the team probably will be better next year, absent really steep declines from the older players (which is possible). But the problem is, that improvement to the mean of their underlying numbers still just puts them.. right back into the mushy middle.
I’m not saying that’s the only factor. All of this has to be taken in context. For example, the Preds play from behind a lot. That leads to other teams playing more defensively and pucks thrown at the net from less dangerous areas, which I’m sure is part of the story. Nonetheless, history suggests teams don’t shoot this poorly multiple seasons on end. The opposite is true too- look at Vancouver this year vs. last year.Bad puck luck for 73 games???? Not buying it. If it was a 15-20 game stretch I might agree with you. If something is this consistent for an entire season it has nothing to do with luck and everything to do with systemic problems.
That's 60 points too high.Based on what I'm hearing I'm 60/40 Brunnette is back next year.
It's gonna happen. I also expect a couple vet pick ups in free agency. Evangelista gets knocked back onto the 3rd line and svechkov starts in the ahlBased on what I'm hearing I'm 60/40 Brunnette is back next year.
I’ve said Preds need a new coach. I’ve said the same things others have said about line combo confusion, player ice time for the kids, D pairs, etc, etc. And what I’ve said laid all the associated problems at the coaches feet.We've never really done that, at least not as cut throat as Vegas anyways. Loyalty to the organization was a pretty big thing Poile would reward, of course he would move you out pretty quick too if he wasn't getting that from players as well.
That said if Poile thought a move was definitely going to make the team better he would move you in a heartbeat, example being trading Weber for Subban.
I think Trotz's biggest issue is he is still thinking too much like a coach. He makes moves based on how he would view it if he was coaching, what he wished GM's would have done for him when he was a coach. Sometimes as a coach you need to be saved from yourself because they have a tendency to play favorites and you get guys playing way more minutes or in spots they shouldn't be because of it. Good example there would be Lavi and Jarnkrok.
Based on what I'm hearing I'm 60/40 Brunnette is back next year.
But if the goal is to tank again for McKenna...I think that’s a career move for Trotz if he brings Bruno back. If improvements aren’t dramatic, both should be fired
I think the problem is the exact opposite, Trotz probably doesn't manage him enough. The reason I say that is I think that Trotz is trying so hard not to be a thorn in Brunette's side that he isn't sticking his nose into things he actually should be. I think that is the reason you are seeing Brunette continue to stack Vet lines, he is still trying to win games like it matters rather than trying to develop. Probably deep down its because he wants to show promise because he is afraid he might lose his job, but I think that is the very thing that might cost him his job.I’ve said Preds need a new coach. I’ve said the same things others have said about line combo confusion, player ice time for the kids, D pairs, etc, etc. And what I’ve said laid all the associated problems at the coaches feet.
But I have begun to believe that I don’t know if he’s a bad coach or not. What I’ve come to believe is that Trotz micro manages the coach to such an extent that he designates the line combos, player ice time, etc.
Agreed.I think the problem is the exact opposite, Trotz probably doesn't manage him enough. The reason I say that is I think that Trotz is trying so hard not to be a thorn in Brunette's side that he isn't sticking his nose into things he actually should be. I think that is the reason you are seeing Brunette continue to stack Vet lines, he is still trying to win games like it matters rather than trying to develop. Probably deep down its because he wants to show promise because he is afraid he might lose his job, but I think that is the very thing that might cost him his job.
It's not a matter of over management, its actually a lack of it. Trotz is trying to run things like he wishes they had been when he was a coach rather than just making the right decisions as a GM.
I think this is absolutely the pivotal question for Trotz.Agreed.
It's not clear Trotz actually knows how to run things like a GM. Unless you think riding around the building on Poile's coattails for a couple months was sufficient to get completely up to speed.