He's not a great all around player and that's not sour grapes from me. He's an average player that is great in front of the net.
Show of hands: how many here are afraid James Neal is a repeat of Jere Karalahti?
james neal creates zilch on his own. without evgeni malkin inflating his stats, he's an average winger who does nothing in the playoffs
james neal creates zilch on his own. without evgeni malkin inflating his stats, he's an average winger who does nothing in the playoffs
james neal creates zilch on his own. without evgeni malkin inflating his stats, he's an average winger who does nothing in the playoffs
That sounds exactly like ....
Patric Hornqvist.
Hornqvist has below average hands, below average shot, below average skater, average in the defensive zone. He works his butt off. He is the best net guy in the league currently. His net presence is what gets him his goals, so he is invaluable in that aspect. But. The rest of his game - it isn't that good. Honestly, he held back his lines at even strength here in Nashville consistently because he isn't good with the puck in any facet, unless he is in front of the goalie. He should do really well in Pittsburgh (as he did here) because he will be able to do his job, work hard, and score dirty goals. Just don't expect much else. He will fit better as a third liner, but he will do fine on the second line. Due to the nature of his game, he would have 20 game stretches with no goals, then score 8 in 15 games. Love the guy. Hard worker. But his talent level, not even comparable to Neal.
FYI, Neal's reputation here on the Pit boards is that he is a bit of a lazy player, his one trick is that he has a really big shot - but never uses his size on along the boards or in front of the net.
He floats, and waits for Malkin to set him up, basically - and it can be frustrating to watch when you are playing opponents with lots of depth and are capable of shutting down our centers (and not everyone is, which is how he is able to put up his big numbers). It does not necessarily feel as though we were fleeced in this trade.
That being said, he was the best player in the trade, for sure - and it seemed like he would be able to bring more back. He did score 40 goals, once.
I don't know anything about Spaling though, and he's the player people are unsure/skeptical about - as he seems to be a 3rd liner with no upside.
Depth we could have got through FA, in other words.
We have enough "work over skill guys," and I've said since Radulov left that if you mix in a few more skilled players, it would balance out. Not everyone has to be Mike Fisher.
Neal isn't going to be asked to come in and be Paul Gaustad...I might be concerned if Trotz was still here. With that said, this is part one...part two...getting a center to play with him(and Smith) is key. If they do that...be it Stastny, Spezza...maybe even Joe Thornton or Patrick Marleau...I think you could be looking a the most dominant offensive line in team history.
One thing you can count on Neal will not be playing with Smith there game is too much alike to have a line be successful. They love to glide thru the slot and score from that area I can't see them as linemates.
One thing you can count on Neal will not be playing with Smith there game is too much alike to have a line be successful. They love to glide thru the slot and score from that area I can't see them as linemates.
And this is a good thing, two snipers on two different lines. It's a neat concept.
And as to the PIT poster who asked:
Hornqvist is a poor man's Tomas Holmstrom.
Spaling is a consistent, young forward who was pretty much on the way to "20-goal scorer" territory, but had streaks of inconsistency.
Need supporting cast still. But I have to be pleased with what Poile has done so far. Hope he is not done.
FYI, Neal's reputation here on the Pit boards is that he is a bit of a lazy player, his one trick is that he has a really big shot - but never uses his size on along the boards or in front of the net.
He floats, and waits for Malkin to set him up, basically - and it can be frustrating to watch when you are playing opponents with lots of depth and are capable of shutting down our centers (and not everyone is, which is how he is able to put up his big numbers). It does not necessarily feel as though we were fleeced in this trade.
That being said, he was the best player in the trade, for sure - and it seemed like he would be able to bring more back. He did score 40 goals, once.
I don't know anything about Spaling though, and he's the player people are unsure/skeptical about - as he seems to be a 3rd liner with no upside.
Depth we could have got through FA, in other words.
looks like no Spezza.....
http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Travis-Yost/Spezza-Nixes-Trade-to-Nashville/134/60978