Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 56,756
- 34,565
both were good in Ottawa.
Stillman didnt add much that Eaves couldnt
Commodre was terrble
hindsight
Eaves declined due to injuries but still was a decent bottom 6 forward
Stillman who repeatedly was called a goal scorer sucked at ...well scoring goals
Corvo would continue to be a good offensive defensemen for years to come including being a top pairing Dman in Carolina.
Commodre was terrible and would leave the NHL after 1 more good season
Both UFAs in commodore and stillman would not resign
So we traded an RFA 20 goal scorer for a ufa non goal scorer
Dynamic offensive defensemen with term for toughness that could barely play hockey and was a ufa
I'm not sure what you mean by Stillman offered nothing Eaves couldn't. Stillman found instant chemisty with Vermette, and was a solid 2 way player for us. Eaves had an unsustainable hot streak in his rookie year that had people expecting too much of him (yourself included it seems, his goal scoring declined every year as a Sen). He was never going to be an elite goal scorer or anything, injuries likely prevented him from being a 3rd line 2nd line tweener as he lacked the skill level to create opportunities on his own.
As for Corvo, he was a nightmare defensively (and bailed on contact far too often), but added some good offense. The team was trying to address the defensive side with Meszaros and Redden expected to carry the load offensively. They also had Lee looking like a promising puck moving D coming up at the time. We were also accused of being too soft, so Commodore was expected to address that. Also, Corvo being a top pairing D in Carolina falls under the same category of Phililps being a top pairing D (the first time, with Volchenkov); not ideal.
Tbh, I would have liked the deal if Stillman was re-signed, but as a pure rental it was a little disapointing.