Proposal: MTL & VAN
- Thread starter Lockin17
- Start date
Peter Griffin
Registered User
Gally is perfect where he is. Habs has no cap issues until his contract his done and we need his leadership in the meantime
Lockin17
Registered User
- Jul 31, 2018
- 3,800
- 2,951
Leadership needs to change with the Habs.
Matheson, Anderson, Dvorak, Gally all gotta go
Only Savard and Evans makes sense to keep atm.
Stewie Griffin
What the deuce
Getting rid of all 3 of those contracts will not be easy. You have to find a team that can both afford and want those players...
Breakers
Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Lockin17
Registered User
- Jul 31, 2018
- 3,800
- 2,951
Nahh Dvorak finish his contract this year,
Gally and Anderson on the other hand is a difficult situation, but they are still decent playoff players.
Cap hit is still 6.5mil
Breakers
Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Yeah but that’s fantasy HFboards roster building
Owners care about salaries and money owed in a guy of Gallaghers age and injury history.
Diamonddog01
Diamond in the rough
HuGort
Registered User
Pass from Montreal. Caproom not an issue for Habs, we 7.4m under. Gallagher is a warrior and our hardest worker
Gillings
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2013
- 3,906
- 2,354
No, Gally Needs to stay. Heart and Soul! Matheson is a "grown up" and his leadserhip is welcome. Also, Anderson and Dvorak are being given an opportunity to grow as players. Let's let them have this and then decide this off season!
But, I agree in general all will and need to go sooner than later, But who replaces Gally. Evans is still young but a good Locker Room Guy!
Sure, let’s just ice a team with 80% of the players 22 and under. What could go wrong.
Nico Cauzuki
Registered User
Nobody wants Gallagher that being said hes actually playing good this season and works hard every shift unlike 95% of our team at 50% im sure some teams would be interested but not for much we’re better off just keeping him
- Oct 9, 2012
- 32,574
- 31,516
Reverend Mayhem
Tell me all your thoughts on God
I don't get the rationale of this other than "send Vancouver guy home" and forwards are the least of our concerns. Now, if we wanna talk Guhle or Matheson, that's more inline with our needs.
Problem? lol
Problem? lol
No, we're 2.22 million over the cap. We just happen to have 7,607,500 of LTIR pool left.
Bouboumaster
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2014
- 10,775
- 9,251
Habs pass
Gallagher is playing well right now
A 4th ain't enough to accept to retain 3.25M for 3 more years
I think that Gallagher at 3.25M a year is good for Vancouver: that's a solid cap hit for a 3rd Line dude that Play that hard with solid leadership. A 4th is basically nothing.
Gallagher is playing well right now
A 4th ain't enough to accept to retain 3.25M for 3 more years
I think that Gallagher at 3.25M a year is good for Vancouver: that's a solid cap hit for a 3rd Line dude that Play that hard with solid leadership. A 4th is basically nothing.
Barsky
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2010
- 254
- 133
It's a rebuild, that should be part of the plan. Is there a position lower than last?
If you’re year 3 in your rebuild while having 3-4 key pieces (top 6 F and top 4 D) when you started and still finish dead last then yeah, there are better positions to be in than that.
It’s not because Ottawa was garbage for nearly a decade that every team should follow their path.
That's an expensive price to pay for a 4th. rounder from a team that already has nine picks in the first four rounds of the '25 draft and doesn't need the cap space . Question is , why ?
Barsky
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2010
- 254
- 133
No pain no gain, don't wanna end up like the Sabres or Wings. In Gary's NHL a small market Canadian team with the worst ownership if NA pro sports has to do what it has to do
