Proposal: Mtl / Tor

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,792
27,847
East Coast
Leafs would have kept the better player in Hyman if they wanted to pay a winger like that. Anderson is trash defensively and not what the Leafs need. He is sold as a power forward in reality he is a rush winger who can't stay healthy.

I think Hyman was a good guy to try to retain. Agreed there. However, I think your assessment on Anderson has exaggeration. My advice is to avoid using narratives like "trash defensively".

I don't like this trade so I'm only talking about what you said towards Anderson. Anderson frustration is consistency but if you really pay attention, he has multiple gears and raises his game in the playoffs. Certainly not a prefect winger and and I will agree with that.

Don't confuse yourself with what media and fans say. Actual Habs management is not desperate to trade Anderson. It's neither a value contract or a bad contract.
 

McJedi

Registered User
Apr 21, 2020
10,724
7,655
Florida
Mtl:
Alex Kerfoot
Holl
Topi Niemela

Tor:
Edmondson
Anderson

Toronto receives two more physical better players an Mtl gets two quality players plus Topi Niemela. Kerfoot and Holl can be dealt at TDL
I can’t fathom Toronto having any interest in this.

Anderson’s contact is one you’d allocate to a core player. Toronto needs to allocate cap space better than an inconsistent winger. That’s not where their roster deficits are best addressed with what minimal cap space they have.

Anderson is a long term commitment. He’s going to be difficult to deal. And no that doesn’t mean he’s negative value. It does means the options to trade him are quite finite.
 

cwede

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 1, 2010
9,985
7,930
Dont see OP offer as really tempting enough to Habs, but at least the D prospect sweetener is signed, and RH
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

Tufted Titmouse

13 Cups.
Apr 5, 2022
6,222
8,322
I feel like there is a pretty huge variability in how people view Anderson's worth.

Some see him as worth a mid 1st, some see him as a bad contract with too much term.

Edmundson I could see getting a 1st, though. I think I'd rather keep Topi and look at trading for Connor Murphy, personally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabsQC

TheGroceryStick

Registered User
Jan 19, 2009
13,915
3,551
Ontario Canada
Good luck to all Leaf fans trying to get a good conversation when HOLL /KERFOOT are in the trade.

Good luck to all non-Leafs hoping to see any other players out of Leaf proposals.. Both (and Engvall) are the likely candidates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy and HabsQC

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
5,144
2,611
We're giving up the 2 best players in the deal and we're getting a prospect we don't need.
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

habsfan44

Registered User
Jul 26, 2006
1,578
447
especially with the brand of hockey he plays as well
What's next ? Criticize McDavid for skating too fast , Tom Wilson for being too tough , Tage Thompson for being too big or Cale Makar for being too skilled ? I don't mind fans being critical of players but it has to at least make sense . Andersons brand of hockey is what got him to the NHL and it's what keeps him there , but I'm willing to bet that if he had a maple leaf on his chest you guys would defend him to no end just like you defend guys like Kerfoot , Nylander and Marner .
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfhabs and HabsQC

Bouboumaster

Registered User
Jul 4, 2014
10,765
9,236
A 2nd pairing defenseman who has missed significant time to injury the last two seasons for a total of 29 games played and a middle six power forward who makes 5.5M per for 5 seasons and has one season above the 40 point barrier.

Justin Holl has averaged over 20 minutes the past 3 seasons in Toronto no matter the defensive makeup on a perrenial playoff team. Edmundson didn't hit 20 minutes just last season on Montreal's 1st overall pick team. But, at 2M he is a cap dump.

Kerfoot just scored 52 points without PP time. Anderson scored 32 points with over 2 minutes of PP time. While, Kerfoot also has reached 40 points or higher 3 times now. While being a regular PK contributer. But, he's a 3rd liner and Anderson is middle six.

Should have fact checked before posting.

Justin Holl is trash bro, who are you trying to convince here?
It's a hockey forum, everybody on this site has a minimum of knowledge on the sport, we all know who Justin Holl is and how much suckage he brings to you. Edmunson is f***ing Bobby Orr in comparison of Justin Holl.

Kerfoot is "ok" but we are already ok and we roll the dice on Monahan as our 3rd line center. Monahan at his best blow out of the water anything Kerfoot ever did in his life

Niemela is fine, but look at our prospect bank, and tell me: where does he fits in?


Edmunson and Anderson are 6'4" and 6'3" monsters. Edmunson, when healthy, is a premier defensive defenseman (you know it, your team experienced him a whole bunch) and Anderson is an unstoppable force when he's at full speed. Not the best hands, but he's A+ for zone entries.

You should think before posting.

Habs refuse this trade, obviously, because it's shit
 
Last edited:

ole ole

Registered User
Oct 7, 2017
11,999
6,088
Topi is worth a 1st now, imo.

I am not sure how to value Anderson....that's a big contract to take on.

Not sure how I feel about this overall, but I think either way, Montreal would do better selling these two separately.
Easily better.
 

ole ole

Registered User
Oct 7, 2017
11,999
6,088
A 2nd pairing defenseman who has missed significant time to injury the last two seasons for a total of 29 games played and a middle six power forward who makes 5.5M per for 5 seasons and has one season above the 40 point barrier.

Justin Holl has averaged over 20 minutes the past 3 seasons in Toronto no matter the defensive makeup on a perrenial playoff team. Edmundson didn't hit 20 minutes just last season on Montreal's 1st overall pick team. But, at 2M he is a cap dump.

Kerfoot just scored 52 points without PP time. Anderson scored 32 points with over 2 minutes of PP time. While, Kerfoot also has reached 40 points or higher 3 times now. While being a regular PK contributer. But, he's a 3rd liner and Anderson is middle six.

Should have fact checked before posting.
Holl right now Sucks. Go on your own board. They can't say anything good about him.
We have no need nor want Kerfoot. We wouldn't take him for free.
The prospect listed isn't near enough.
This is an EASY NO for the Habs. no natter how you try to slice it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

biturbo19

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
27,233
12,382
Are Montreal even allowed to trade the entirety of Edmonton to the Leafs like that? Seems sketchy.
 

Dion TheFluff

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
4,135
3,635
What's next ? Criticize McDavid for skating too fast , Tom Wilson for being too tough , Tage Thompson for being too big or Cale Makar for being too skilled ? I don't mind fans being critical of players but it has to at least make sense . Andersons brand of hockey is what got him to the NHL and it's what keeps him there , but I'm willing to bet that if he had a maple leaf on his chest you guys would defend him to no end just like you defend guys like Kerfoot , Nylander and Marner .
all I was saying
What's next ? Criticize McDavid for skating too fast , Tom Wilson for being too tough , Tage Thompson for being too big or Cale Makar for being too skilled ? I don't mind fans being critical of players but it has to at least make sense . Andersons brand of hockey is what got him to the NHL and it's what keeps him there , but I'm willing to bet that if he had a maple leaf on his chest you guys would defend him to no end just like you defend guys like Kerfoot , Nylander and Marner .
I wasn't saying there was anything wrong with the way he plays. All I was saying was players who play that aggressive & physical brand typically end up burning our faster than other styles of players.

5 x 5.5 is far to big of a risk for Anderson IMO. Especially considering that he already has injury history.
 

Junohockeyfan

Registered User
Dec 16, 2018
15,088
12,823
No team would take on garbage like Holl and Kerfoot for free. What an absolute crap proposal for the Habs.

There is no incentive for the Habs to take on Leafs garbage. None.
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

habsfan44

Registered User
Jul 26, 2006
1,578
447
all I was saying

I wasn't saying there was anything wrong with the way he plays. All I was saying was players who play that aggressive & physical brand typically end up burning our faster than other styles of players.

5 x 5.5 is far to big of a risk for Anderson IMO. Especially considering that he already has injury history.
I think Thats a false narrative , power forwards have long productive careers just like other players , do they sustain injuries ? of course they do but the ice ballerinas and perimeter players also suffer their fair share of injuries as well and I hate to break it to you but a large percentage of NHL players have an injury history and trying to diminish a players value because of that history just seems petty to me .
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

LeafGrief

Shambles in my brain
Apr 10, 2015
7,912
10,197
Ottawa
Not really interested in Anderson, that contract isn't going to work with our structure any time soon and he's got a career high of 45 points. He's a decent player, but 5.5m is too much for what he brings. If we were going to try and bring in a 3rd liner who hits and score big goals, we're going to get someone cheaper or better. Scoring big goals and hitting is awesome, and I have no doubt he will continue to torch the Leafs. Wrong contract.

Edmunsen seems like a decent pickup. If we were to go after him, I'd rather it be a Lightning style deal where the Habs retain half and take a decent asset. Wouldn't go too crazy on the value there, but I wouldn't be against him and at 50% he'd be an intriguing asset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: malcb33

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad