Lockin17
Registered User
- Jul 31, 2018
- 3,837
- 2,992
Proposal: MTL & SJ
- Thread starter Lockin17
- Start date
- Status
FerrisRox
"Wanna go, Prettyboy?"
That's a pass for me, from Montreal.
Patty Ice
Mighty Luca
No thanks. Sharks already have their fair share of undersize dmen.
- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,763
- 39,708
Nuetral fan saying San Jose just sticks with chernyshov
SannywithoutCompy
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2020
- 2,523
- 4,704
With Barron not really living up to his potential yet and the future top 9 looking more than filled out I'd probably pass on this from a Montreal POV. We need a potential bottom 4 RHD more than we need a potential middle 6 winger.
Kent Nilsson
Imagine cringing at Brock Nelson like a moron
- Jan 31, 2016
- 4,551
- 4,416
I'm not supporting the trade in any way. But are we really calling a 6' 202 lb player undersized?
- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,763
- 39,708
To add to my initial thought
Sharks still need skill/depth everywhere outside of top 6 centers…. No point moving prospects when the next 2 years are going to be rebuild/developmental years
I think they need wingers as much as they need dmen
Sharks still need skill/depth everywhere outside of top 6 centers…. No point moving prospects when the next 2 years are going to be rebuild/developmental years
I think they need wingers as much as they need dmen
Patty Ice
Mighty Luca
Wasn't referring to Struble but I assumed Konyushkov was the appetizing bit.
Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 26,335
- 13,643
Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 26,335
- 13,643
Jared Dunn
Registered User
Basically what I was going to say. Chernyshov was a steal where he was picked and probably should have been picked in the 14-20. I will probably get laughed at for the opinion but I think Chernyshov Currently is a better version of Sennecke.
Chernyshov is way more NHL ready while Sennecke will probably need a couple years but he has the potential to be better then Chernyshov
hohosaregood
Banned
- Sep 1, 2011
- 33,158
- 13,800
Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 26,335
- 13,643
Guy was drafted after Hage for a reason
It would likelly cost a late 2nd to move up from 33 to 21. So itll cost a 2nd for Hage
Spearmint Rhino
Registered User
- Sep 17, 2013
- 9,332
- 9,352
No interest, need to keep some depth with our young D with Matheson and Savard moving on before too long, not all of them will hit.
Cause he's Russian and he found out that in California you need sunscreen if you go to the beach.
He wasn't able to go to his agencies prospect camp to show off because he got a bad sunburn. I'm guessing some uptight GM's put him lower on their draft list because they thought him stupid.
Any Hab's fan that says no to the OP's trade should give their head a shake.
Last edited:
It's never a good idea to trade a player you just drafted less than 2 months ago. It shows a lack of commitment to player development.
Last edited:
Habs scouting group thought there was only a 20% chance Hage would be there at 21. There is no way they would entertain trading him now unless it's a huge overpayment.
CanadienShark
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2012
- 40,076
- 14,772
Habs are also not at the point were they should cut their D pool further.
Need to know how Xhekaj, Struble, Hutson, Konyushkov, Barron, Mailloux, Engstrokm and Reinbacher fall into places before trading them away.
Need to know how Xhekaj, Struble, Hutson, Konyushkov, Barron, Mailloux, Engstrokm and Reinbacher fall into places before trading them away.
ReimanSum1908
Registered User
Probably the same reason Michkov wasn't selected second.
Habs fan saying that Chernyshov should have gone in the top 20 and has more value than the package.
- Status
