CanadienShark
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2012
- 40,047
- 14,733
When I read the word "garbage" in the description of a player in here it has become non useful. If you really believe this get yourself some skates and a stick and go show the player you are sluring how to do things.garbage
Sissons is a perfectly good 3rd line center. If they are going to need a center it's going to be on the 2nd line, and that's if Novak just can't improve on where he was last season. I don't see Trotz moving futures to upgrade the bottom six. They have enough pieces in the pipeline to give some younger guys shots if needed.View attachment 899689
Pretty sad on the third and 4th line ,
Dvorak could fill the third line center, Anderson on their third line as well
No offense, but those exact same arguments were made regarding Monahan at the deadline. He still returned a 1st. The truth of the matter is we as fans can speculate but at the end of the day we have no real idea how players would be deployed on the new team and if their value is decreased or not in the eyes of a gm considering them. That said I'm all for eviscerating Lockedin's proposals at every opportunitySissons > Dvorak
Jankowski = Anderson and you don't pay 50% of Andersons contract for him to play on the forth line. not a big enough upgrade and I don't know if it is.
Matheson wouldn't get 1st PP minutes so his value drops and would Matheson on the 2nd PP really be that much better then Skjei?
Savard makes some sense but he isn't worth what you are offering. Maybe at the deadline and Nashville has struck out on all the other deadline RD.
Yes, and Monahan went to a team with a putrid PP and an opening for him (4 forwards get PP1 as well making it easier).No offense, but those exact same arguments were made regarding Monahan at the deadline. He still returned a 1st. The truth of the matter is we as fans can speculate but at the end of the day we have no real idea how players would be deployed on the new team and if their value is decreased or not in the eyes of a gm considering them. That said I'm all for eviscerating Lockedin's proposals at every opportunity
You're just begging to be sent the way of Slafy.
Easily lmao. He is a liability on anything but the power play and he will never sit above Josi in that regard. Skjei is at worst just as good as him for the 2nd unit and is actually good at 5v5.How can you say that Matheson won't be a big upgrade on the top 4 ?
Dvorak would sure be a upgrade on the third line.
Savard ? damn he does it all.
Ok then ....
Dvorak could fill it for 30 or so games before breaking.View attachment 899689
Pretty sad on the third and 4th line ,
Dvorak could fill the third line center, Anderson on their third line as well
Dvorak could fill it for 30 or so games before breaking.
When I read the word "garbage" in the description of a player in here it has become non useful. If you really believe this get yourself some skates and a stick and go show the player you are sluring how to do things.
Oh. Well. It's good we cleared that up, then.Again folks, this guy, who definitely isn’t Slafy (the Habs fan who continually made awful garbage proposals) who just showed up making awful Habs proposals immediately after Slafy’s disappearance does not speak for “Habs Nation.”
Also it’s definitely, for sure, not Slafy. It’s for sure somebody completely different. Totally.
1) Flaming: Critique the opinion, not the person. Personal attacks against members are not permitted. Report flaming, do not respond to it. Counter-flaming is also prohibited.There is a clear pattern here between this poster and one that "disappeared" right when this one started posting, despite the number of posts he has. That means he changed his name, probably several times.
All of his trades are the exact same formula that just end up making Habs fans look bad.
As for the other part, none of his threads have been locked, except one, that happens to include a team of importance to someone important.
Also, I actually do have proof he's Slafy.
There is a clear pattern here between this poster and one that "disappeared" right when this one started posting, despite the number of posts he has. That means he changed his name, probably several times.
All of his trades are the exact same formula that just end up making Habs fans look bad.
As for the other part, none of his threads have been locked, except one, that happens to include a team of importance to someone important.
Also, I actually do have proof he's Slafy.
Agree that NAS wouldn't really be interested in these players. But a 2nd rd pick isn't necessarily a "high end" piece.Oh yeah, NSH wants all sorts of garbage for high end pieces. Spoke with Barry yesterday and he said any low pieces he could find were his.
dont include Slafy with the rest of us pleaseClassic stuff Habs Nation! Think you might have got the picks mixed up on the Dvorak and Anderson trade proposals.
Walman kicked Yzerman's dog. Not a valid comparison.Agree that NAS wouldn't really be interested in these players. But a 2nd rd pick isn't necessarily a "high end" piece.
If it is, that means that Yzerman sent Walman and a high end piece for future considerations.
Maybe the dog deserved it.Walman kicked Yzerman's dog. Not a valid comparison.
Am I missing something? Nashvilles cap situation is uglyNashville is in for the win, signing Stamkos, Marchesseault, and Josi, O'reilly not getting any younger.
Could the Habs trade some decent pieces for future ?
I see Dvorak, Matheson, Savard, Anderson being targets for Nashville.
MTL : Matheson (50%)
for
NAS : Fedor Svechkov OR best of first 2025
or
MTL : Dvorak (50%)
for
NAS : Tampa 2nd 2025
or
MTL : Savard (50%) + 3rd 2025
for
NAS : Worse between Nash and Tamps first in 2025
or
MTL ; Anderson (50%) + 4th 2025
for
NAS : Nash 2nd pick 2025