You failed to miss the point. Selling Romanov for Hronek isn’t selling low. They’re essentially two years apart so if you compare Hronek 19-20 season to Romanov currently you’d see the difference in production/GP which is why neutral fans are asking why Detroit would do it. There’s no incentive for Detroit to downgrade in defense for winger depth and it sounds like you don’t mind the LD/RD swap. I’ve already posted our LHD pipeline so your argument doesn’t really make sense.
No, I do understand your point and were not 100% on the same page or in agreement. One of them has 64 NHL games at age 20/21 on a team trying to make the playoffs and the other has 175 NHL games at the age of 21-24 on a team that is bottom of the NHL and more open to playing youth while they learn on the job.
Your basically saying Romanov has no chance to mature and grow while at the same time, Hronek has had that time. Complete ignorance cause you think Romanov will disappoint or bust but I bet you had the same hope in potential for Hronek at the same age point. Go ahead, try to use his age 21/22 season of points production as your "proof"
I also think you are going to assume that I'm saying Romanov will be as good as Hronek or better down the road. If you do, it's false but I can't control your comprehension and I won't be held responsible for it either.
The main point? Neither team is desperate for the Hronek/Romanov swap even if the Habs should add a pick. The part where Toffoli is added for cap reasons is the real joke!