danisonfire
2313 Saint Catherine
- Jul 2, 2009
- 1,614
- 770
Markov had a more well rounded game for sure. Both were good players. Markov wasn't as athletically gifted as Subban but he has so many plus positive attributes.It was not at the end of his career, but in the middle he missed a ton of time.
2009 to 2012 he was always hurt.
At the end of his time in Montreal he played almost every game the last 4-5 seasons.....his career almost in three stages, but 11 out of 14 years, he was healthy almost all the time.............those years in the middle he had some strange and decimating injuries.
Check the stats on Hockey DB.
As for who, I pick Markov over Subban every time...........and I loved Subban. Markov was steady eddie making everyone around him better. But man, Subban had some serious Flash to his game!
![stathead.com](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fssref.net%2Fscripts%2Fimage_resize.cgi%3Ffoo%3Dbar%26flat%3D0%26url1%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.hockey-reference.com%2Freq%2F202301051%2Fimages%2Fheadshots%2Fmarkoan01-2015.jpg%26url2%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.hockey-reference.com%2Freq%2F202301051%2Fimages%2Fheadshots%2Fsubbapk01-2020.jpg&hash=f1cadf98e42ee536015e86df5d8134af&return_error=1)
Andrei Markov vs. P.K. Subban: Head-to-Head Stats Comparison | Stathead.com
Compare Players: Check out the head-to-head stats of Andrei Markov and P.K. Subban including their awards, honors, championships, playoff and regular season stats, and much more on Stathead.com
![stathead.com](https://cdn.ssref.net/req/202407291/favicons/stathead/favicon-48.png)
Last edited: