Proposal: MTL & CGY

[dgibb10]

No he’s not and no blue chip would ever be on the table for a guy turning 28 that will need a new (long term) contract at 30.

I agree. Teams VERY rarely trade blue chips unless they demand out a la Cutter Gauthier or maybe Rutger McGroarty (although I think him and Yager fall short of "blue chip" category)

 

[The Gr8 Dane]

No need to add this player to our roster right now

 

[Yepthatsme]

Mailloux is better then Brzustewicz


you don't know that ,,,, don't speculate

Mailloux Draft +1 and +2 combined:
71 games, 62 points, +22

Brzustewicz Draft +1:
67 games, 92 points, +31

In their pre draft as prospects you may have been right, but Brzustewicz just had a more impressive season than any of Mailloux’s 3 years since his draft, and appears to have built off it with his extremely strong play this pre-season so far.

 

[bert]

I think CGY says no for two reasons:
1. They already have Parekh and Brzustewicz on the right side.
2. They want a blue chip back, not a couple B level prospects.

100 p.

 

[pth2]

mmmm no
Not even that close tbh



Really not sure how many times this needs to be stated.

Low information fans don't remember the trade conditions.
High information fans are done with Slafy.

 

[EK392000]

So the best rookie rman in the AHL last season is not a bluechip prospect.... Interesting!

He wasn’t the best rookie dman. He was on the all rookie team, alongside Brandt Clarke who had virtually the same production in 22 less games.

Believe it or not, I can still think he’s a good prospect without thinking he’s a blue chip.

 

[Ledge And Dairy]

He wasn’t the best rookie dman. He was on the all rookie team, alongside Brandt Clarke who had virtually the same production in 22 less games.

Believe it or not, I can still think he’s a good prospect without thinking he’s a blue chip.

You can add Olen Zellweger to that list as well, both were quite clearly much better than Mailloux, just with less games played.

 

[Habs Halifax]

Mailloux is a blue chip

Not Blue Chip level but I would say Grade A for sure. He's showing ability to be effective at both ends and not many know that much about him (yet).

Habs are not making this offer. We don't need R Anderson

 

[Lunatik]

So the best rookie rman in the AHL last season is not a bluechip prospect.... Interesting!

No he isn't. A blue chipper prospect is a can't miss prospect. The fact he was in the AHL at all means he's not a blue chipper if we're honest.

Also you guys drafted the piece of trash, you keep your human garbage.

 

[Habs Halifax]

Haven't we had this discussion before? Trading for Anderson makes no sense for Montreal unless the price is low and Calgary isn't trading Anderson for a minimal return.

Agreed. Some Habs fans needs to let that idea go. It doesn't fit Montreal and our timing.

 

[Lockin17]

Funny how people are 100% sure that CGY will finish top 10 in the draft.

Top 9 forwards are not bad at all.
Top 4 D is pretty good as well.

If they want to finish top 10 in the draft they need to start selling.
If not they might end up between #11 to #15 or around that.

 

[Lockin17]

Also you guys drafted the piece of trash, you keep your human garbage.

yeah i am sure you are a perfect human.....

 

[Lockin17]

The plan here is to start CGY rebuild and for the Habs having a better vet then Savard on the right side.

Matheson-Guhle
Hutson-Anderson
Wifi-Savard

Could be a solid top 6 for the habs and have a shot at making the playoff.
Anderson still have a good 5 years ahead of him just like Matheson.

That's basically 3 first rd for Anderson.

 

[Figgy44]

The plan here is to start CGY rebuild and for the Habs having a better vet then Savard on the right side.

Matheson-Guhle
Hutson-Anderson
Wifi-Savard

Could be a solid top 6 for the habs and have a shot at making the playoff.
Anderson still have a good 5 years ahead of him just like Matheson.

That's basically 3 first rd for Anderson.

I appreciate the generosity, but I'll basically say no thank you.