Proposal: MTL & CGY

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Beendair Donedat

Juice Arse 2.0
Dec 29, 2010
5,835
6,734
Truth or Consequences, NM
No thank you, Mr Definitely wasn’t Slafy. Maybe you could find another forum to post these in, preferably on another site? The Habs pollution would drop 98%

Habs aren’t giving up a bunch of ELC’s, and a total of 3 1st rounders for Andersson. Even for you, and any other username that you may have had in the past, that’s pretty awful.
 

EK392000

Registered User
Mar 9, 2020
1,198
1,505
I think CGY says no for two reasons:
1. They already have Parekh and Brzustewicz on the right side.
2. They want a blue chip back, not a couple B level prospects.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: CF84 and jfhabs

Bond

Registered User
May 10, 2012
4,341
3,270
I think CGY says no for two reasons:
1. They already have Parekh and Brzustewicz on the right side.
2. They want a blue chip back, not a couple B level prospects.
This trade only goes down if Panthers are out of the playoffs at American Thanksgiving
 

Iwishihadaspacebar

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
1,341
1,547
In terms of value, it probably isn't far off but there are likely teams willing to give up just a bit more.

That first is going to be the Panthers' pick so is likely very late again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dgibb10

Iwishihadaspacebar

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
1,341
1,547
Mailloux is better then Brzustewicz


you don't know that ,,,, don't speculate
If the Flames are selling, which would be the case of they are trading one if their best D, their pick is almost certainly top 10 which means it becomes the Florida pick.
 
Last edited:

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
54,087
68,761
No thank you, Mr Definitely wasn’t Slafy. Maybe you could find another forum to post these in, preferably on another site? The Habs pollution would drop 98%

Habs aren’t giving up a bunch of ELC’s, and a total of 3 1st rounders for Andersson. Even for you, and any other username that you may have had in the past, that’s pretty awful.
Mesar most definitely does not have 1st round value.
 

EK392000

Registered User
Mar 9, 2020
1,198
1,505
Mailloux is a blue chip
Don’t want to argue about definitions but I don’t think he is. Not to say he isn’t good. He’s just not in the same tier as other prospects around the league, or even within the Habs system. I consider Reinbacher and Hutson blue chips.
 

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
5,096
2,536
Don’t want to argue about definitions but I don’t think he is. Not to say he isn’t good. He’s just not in the same tier as other prospects around the league, or even within the Habs system. I consider Reinbacher and Hutson blue chips.
If he's not blue chip he's extremely close. He's generally underrated on these boards.
 

McJedi

Registered User
Apr 21, 2020
10,654
7,575
Florida
MTL : Mailloux + Mesar + CGY first 2025
for
CGY : R, Anderson
That's a weak offer from the Habs.

The real offer here is the Florida pick around 27th OA, a B level dime a dozen guy in Mesar and a solid B+/A- guy in Mailloux with some bad noise around him that will always be in the background.

Easy no from the Flames if I'm their GM. I'd be a hard no on Mesar as part of the deal and I'd want the Habs 2025 1st instead. And someone/thing better than Mesar.

Habs 2025 1st (top 5 protected / assume ~13th OA value range) + Mailloux + better prospect than Mesar.
 

BJCOLLINS

Registered User
Jul 7, 2003
2,751
1,185
Pirate Satellite
lol, Habs aren’t looking for D. They are stacked with dynamic young D prospects knocking at the door.

In a couple of years when they are competitive they may look for a R Anderson type D.
 

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
35,827
57,495
Weegartown
lol, Habs aren’t looking for D. They are stacked with dynamic young D prospects knocking at the door.

In a couple of years when they are competitive they may look for a R Anderson type D.

If they are stacked with dynamic young D prospects why would they be looking for a R Andersson type D in a couple years?
 

HuGo Sham

MR. CLEAN-up ©Runner77
Apr 7, 2010
28,251
20,269
Montreal
If they are stacked with dynamic young D prospects why would they be looking for a R Andersson type D in a couple years?
they wouldn't - and this isn't a deal they're making. If anything, they're looking for more firepower up front and probably trying to dump either Evans or Dvorak if Kaponen keeps playing like he did last night
 
  • Like
Reactions: CTHabsfan

CTHabsfan

Registered User
Jul 28, 2007
1,398
1,137
Haven't we had this discussion before? Trading for Anderson makes no sense for Montreal unless the price is low and Calgary isn't trading Anderson for a minimal return.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuGo Sham

LPHabsFan

Registered User
Jul 14, 2003
2,739
1,438
Montreal
Visit site
No thank you, Mr Definitely wasn’t Slafy. Maybe you could find another forum to post these in, preferably on another site? The Habs pollution would drop 98%

Habs aren’t giving up a bunch of ELC’s, and a total of 3 1st rounders for Andersson. Even for you, and any other username that you may have had in the past, that’s pretty awful.
If only there was a way for a person who is a confirmed troll, to the point of needing to change their name, could be stopped from intentionally flaming and making look bad a certain fanbase.

If only that were possible. What a world that would be.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad