Proposal: MTL & CGY

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Beendair Donedat

Juice Arse 2.0
Dec 29, 2010
5,834
6,732
Truth or Consequences, NM
No thank you, Mr Definitely wasn’t Slafy. Maybe you could find another forum to post these in, preferably on another site? The Habs pollution would drop 98%

Habs aren’t giving up a bunch of ELC’s, and a total of 3 1st rounders for Andersson. Even for you, and any other username that you may have had in the past, that’s pretty awful.
 

EK392000

Registered User
Mar 9, 2020
1,197
1,503
I think CGY says no for two reasons:
1. They already have Parekh and Brzustewicz on the right side.
2. They want a blue chip back, not a couple B level prospects.
 

Bond

Registered User
May 10, 2012
4,338
3,269
I think CGY says no for two reasons:
1. They already have Parekh and Brzustewicz on the right side.
2. They want a blue chip back, not a couple B level prospects.
This trade only goes down if Panthers are out of the playoffs at American Thanksgiving
 

Iwishihadaspacebar

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
1,341
1,547
In terms of value, it probably isn't far off but there are likely teams willing to give up just a bit more.

That first is going to be the Panthers' pick so is likely very late again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dgibb10

Iwishihadaspacebar

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
1,341
1,547
Mailloux is better then Brzustewicz


you don't know that ,,,, don't speculate
If the Flames are selling, which would be the case of they are trading one if their best D, their pick is almost certainly top 10 which means it becomes the Florida pick.
 
Last edited:

junyab

Registered User
Jan 22, 2013
1,908
1,058
Flames would get better offers from contenders with limited cap space and narrow winning window.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad