Not what I have said at all.
My statement was:
-taking on risky and expensive contracts as cap dumps is not a new or genius idea
-MTLs large budget gives them a lot more leeway compared to other cellar dwellers like SJS and Anaheim rn
-taking on 17 million in money is not risk free
-this could have an impact on future years due to LTIR rollovers (especially if bonuses add up with all of MTLs rookies)
Then, a MTL fan made the claim that a rebuilding team's primary focus should be getting the kids opportunities.
I responded by pointing out adding Laine actually takes opportunities away from MTLs kids.
I have questioned the value that a supposed hometown discount will provide beyond the 2 years he is contracted for.
And I have had to inform a shockingly high number of MTL fans who don't understand how LTIR works.
In fact, I like the move for MTL. The upside is there with laine to be an EV scorer and PP weapon better than anyone currently on their roster. It fills a hole. And, if things go well, Laine can help them push for the playoffs next year.
I am simply not going to pretend that bringing in a guy with laine's history and paying him 17 million dollars carries no risk.