Two wrongs don't make a rightIt’s better than paying a 2nd to get rid of a player which had positive value. He’s got 2 more years and it won’t affect our cap structure.
Lose a 2nd and get Harris would be preferred, because Rakell is cap and term coming back.You know.
Columbus fans told me Rakell + a 2nd was bad value for Laine.
Well Columbus Rakell and a 2nd or lose a 2nd and get Harris.
Instead they got a bottom pairing Defensemen cost controlled though. Maybe they can flip him at the deadline to a team for a 3rd?
I strongly suspect it will.Hopefully this works out like the Monahan deal for MTL.
armia, savard and Dvorak are off the books in a year..C Price to LTIR..Does Montreal plan on competing ever? They have some bad contracts and are collecting more.
Maybe when their core is approaching 30 they will start?
Both of those are buyouts and don't impact the retention slotsBecause they're retaining on Wennberg and Boqvist which means they have 1 retain slot left which they're holding for Elvis.
Also they're paying Mike Babcock, Brad Larsson and Pascal Vincent. Ownership may have told Waddell no more dead money for a while.
Seems that way. I don't think it was the right call, but whatever. Also really don't like the return. My impression of Waddell so far is that he's been fine on signings but his trades have been poor. Maybe he'll prove me wrong tho.
The downside of this trade for Habs is.
Laine, Anderson, and Gallagher combining for 20.7M
ouchies
You're probably more familar with Slaf's playing style and strengths so tell me what makes them a good fit in your opinion?Perfect player to play alongside Slafkovsky.
Still winning more playoffs rounds than the Leafs to be honest. The core is already signed or will be on ELC in the next 2 years, but thanks for your concerns.Does Montreal plan on competing ever? They have some bad contracts and are collecting more.
Maybe when their core is approaching 30 they will start?
Also, not close to PPG with CBJ.
We've been rebuilding for 3 years , you're clearly salty we got a free player for peanuts and our fanbase is happy about itDoes Montreal plan on competing ever? They have some bad contracts and are collecting more.
Maybe when their core is approaching 30 they will start?
Also, not close to PPG with CBJ.
Slaf is probably the best cross ice passer on the team , suzuki is close but Slaf sends piss missiles all over the iceYou're probably more familar with Slaf's playing style and strengths so tell me what makes them a good fit in your opinion?
Neither of those are retention slots. Retention != buyout.Because they're retaining on Wennberg and Boqvist which means they have 1 retain slot left which they're holding for Elvis.
Also they're paying Mike Babcock, Brad Larsson and Pascal Vincent. Ownership may have told Waddell no more dead money for a while.
17 million dollar secondBig winning for Montreal.
Even if Laine does not play. Free 2nd.
We've been rebuilding for 3 years , you're clearly salty we got a free player for peanuts and our fanbase is happy about it
I get that Rakell at 5 million for 4 years. Is cap on the books.Lose a 2nd and get Harris would be preferred, because Rakell is cap and term coming back.
Of all the undesired scenarios that were proposed that we were saying "no", to, this is arguably most constructive one. Survivable since most of the considerations that ruled Harris out went away shortly after Waddell came in and cleaned house. Still not great for us tho.
This is the 8.7x 2 million dollar question imo and no one knows. Best hypothesis we've heard is he's been dealing with depression after his Dad passed away but it's based on absolutely nothing.Excuse me, but why could Laine not make it work in Columbus? What about his mental condition is a result of playing in and for Columbus?
This is a serious question. I’m not being sarcastic. Just trying to understand how and why he had them over a barrel like this.
Armia put up career numbers, size and he's a beast for the cycle game.So Dvorak or Armia?