Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Brindamour with both because he's a better coach? We're done losing.Would you take St-Louis with the Canes team or Brindamour with the Habs team?
Brindamour with both because he's a better coach? We're done losing.Would you take St-Louis with the Canes team or Brindamour with the Habs team?
Anyone who called Slafkovsky a bust was wrong to do so at every moment and in every instance.According to some, Slaf was a bust... until he wasn't anymore
Why did they have that opinion?
Did they jump to conclusion too quick?
Do they have bad judgment?
Are they just stubborn?
To those people... do you not see the progress this team has made under MSL over the last two seasons?
You don't jump from under construction to stanley cup champions in a short time
My irrelevant comparison serves to try to have a better understanding of the people who jump to conclusion too quickly... they only look at numbers and then type away nonsensical bsAnyone who called Slafkovsky a bust was wrong to do so at every moment and in every instance.
Your irrelevant comparison aside, I think you should read my other comment on the first page. Not only does it answer your question with a clear affirmation, it also reinforces the fact MSL has earned a shot to coach an actually worthwhile team.
But I won't go so far and say MSL is a better coach than Brind'amour, because that would be a stupid thing to think.
So far he has done very well. We'll see how MSL does when he has a playoff calibre team.It’s not about MSL not being good
He’s just not in the elite category for now