Kobe Armstrong
Registered User
- Jul 26, 2011
- 16,590
- 7,831
That's fair but if there was an unbiased poll done on who was a better coach, RBA would run away with it.How can one quantify who's the better coach when they're tasked with different objectives or aren't afforded the same perameters.
The only way you could differentiate the two is by giving them both the exact same rosters and then judge those results.
Everything else is just subjective.
Removing Marty for Brind'Amour at this juncture doesn't do the habs any favours, if anything it would be more than likely detrimental. MSL has done everything he's been asked to do by those who hired him..
MSL just does not have the resume to compete with him.
There just isn't a logical argument that a guy who has coached a bottom 5 team for 2 years in the league is better than a guy who has coached for 15+ years in the league and has multiple conference finals appearances.
Of course I hope Marty is more accomplished than him in 10+ years, I just don't think he will even want to stick around that long because he always looks like he's drowning on the bench
Basically my only issue with St. Louis is the flat refusal to hire an experienced tactician to help him behind the bench. He hired assistants that were just as inexperienced as he was and blocked HuGo from signing an experienced associate coach when they offered to helpThere is a little difference in talent. Right now St Louis is the guy for the job, a teaching coach. If the Habs start improving he stays, if his strategy starts holding the Habs back, tell him to change it. If he won't, then ask him to please stay on as an assistant teaching coach and hope like hell that he does.